Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: Are FAST lens really good?

  1. #1

    Default Are FAST lens really good?

    how good are lens like those f2.8, f1.4 etc...
    for one are very expensive... but how good are they.... if we talk about being fast, how well can they actually take photos in poor lighting? using a tripod will reduce the shakes already, so is a fast lens still necessary? etc...etc...
    just some thoughts and questions about fast lens...

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    sing
    Posts
    3,353

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    f2.8 is not fast for standard lens
    f1.4 ...hmm.... so so only.

    well again depends on focal length.

    if 400mm then f2.8 is fast.

    for std lens
    fast is f1.2
    fast is f1.0 -- Leica Noctilux
    Canon had a f0.95 lens.

    Good in the sense that you buy them for special reason. i.e. shoot at full aperture in low light. You get the shot without flash.

    Do not expect them to be as sharp as your f4.0 macro lens.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by mazeppa26
    how good are lens like those f2.8, f1.4 etc...
    for one are very expensive... but how good are they.... if we talk about being fast, how well can they actually take photos in poor lighting? using a tripod will reduce the shakes already, so is a fast lens still necessary? etc...etc...
    just some thoughts and questions about fast lens...
    Why don't you try out a fast lens and tell us!

    Really, if fast lenses are not good, you think they can sell that many and charge that kind of price?
    deadpoet
    my portfolio

  4. #4

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    In an age of clean ISO 800/1600 and noise ninja, fast lenses are not as necessary as they once were. Nevertheless, if you want the DOF/bokeh, or if you need the high shutter speed at low light, they are indispensable.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    They also help in helping you focus fast AND accurately under low light condition. Else you will find that even with ISO ramped up to 3200 for shutter speed and tripod everything, you won't get many usable shots because it backfocused etc....esp if your body is lower-end based. If subject is moving slightly, then even more so.
    Last edited by 2100; 5th March 2006 at 08:08 AM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by ricohflex
    Do not expect them to be as sharp as your f4.0 macro lens.
    I'd venture to say the 85/1.2L is sharper than the f4.0 macro lens
    My Personal Folio (of random events and things)

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Westy
    Posts
    2,671

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    most of the fast lens are not just 'fast', like what 2100 mentioned, they tend to focus better, faster and more accurately, they have more solid builts and gives better colours too..

    so the price you are paying for one is not just about the f-stop..

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    north
    Posts
    1,310

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    if you do quite a bit of shooting in the streets. fast lens can come in very handy. esp. in badly lit wet markets for eg, place is too busy for you to setup tripod.and i dont think the ppl will like it when so many ppl looking at you taking pic of him.

    at ISO400, a 35/f2 lens can give a 1/125 in a wet market( may vary due to ligthing in e market)

    if you are using a f4-5.6, the shutter is reduce to 1/60. even if you have very steady hands, the subj's movement is gonna blur your photo.

    get a 50/1.8 to try. is sharp, fast and cheap

  9. #9
    Senior Member yyD70S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,454

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Arcanic~
    most of the fast lens are not just 'fast', like what 2100 mentioned, they tend to focus better, faster and more accurately, they have more solid builts and gives better colours too..

    so the price you are paying for one is not just about the f-stop..

    With the added plus of a 'slightly brighter VF'.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by mazeppa26
    how good are lens like those f2.8, f1.4 etc...
    for one are very expensive... but how good are they.... if we talk about being fast, how well can they actually take photos in poor lighting? using a tripod will reduce the shakes already, so is a fast lens still necessary? etc...etc...
    just some thoughts and questions about fast lens...
    In some situation, you simple cannot use a tripod or a flash. Sometimes, a difference of one f-stop can determine whether you can handhold or not.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Most good lenses are fast, but not all fast lenses are good.

    As others have already stated, there are a number of factors which make a lens good, how large the aperture is but one of them.

    Good lenses are generally more well know for the colour, contrast and sharpness (and lack of BD, CA, etc...) they produce first and their speed second. Even the 'icon' lenses like the EF 85 1.2 will give better results when stopped down 1 or stops.

    The legendary Canon 50 1.0 (very rare and expensive) is one of the fasteset around, but by all the accounts I've read is far from a 'good' lens, especially at the price.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bt Batok
    Posts
    768

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    generally, fast lenses r better thn slower 1s. my tokina 28-80/2.8 is sharp by f4, can a 17-70/3.5-4.5 claim the same? wait, it cant even be f4 at tele.

    bottom line, fast lenses r the pro series of a manufacturer's line up. slower lenses r the consumer series.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    They are good for indoor, low light conditions and when you can't use / don't have / too lazy to use a tripod..

    Not all fast lens are good, and not all good lens are fast

    Quote Originally Posted by mazeppa26
    how good are lens like those f2.8, f1.4 etc...
    for one are very expensive... but how good are they.... if we talk about being fast, how well can they actually take photos in poor lighting? using a tripod will reduce the shakes already, so is a fast lens still necessary? etc...etc...
    just some thoughts and questions about fast lens...
    Last edited by jeryltan; 5th March 2006 at 09:51 AM.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Fast lens not only less noise.. Also less handshake and motion blurr..

    Quote Originally Posted by waileong
    In an age of clean ISO 800/1600 and noise ninja, fast lenses are not as necessary as they once were. Nevertheless, if you want the DOF/bokeh, or if you need the high shutter speed at low light, they are indispensable.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    1st time Iheard this..

    Quote Originally Posted by roti_prata
    generally, fast lenses r better thn slower 1s. my tokina 28-80/2.8 is sharp by f4, can a 17-70/3.5-4.5 claim the same? wait, it cant even be f4 at tele.

    bottom line, fast lenses r the pro series of a manufacturer's line up. slower lenses r the consumer series.
    Last edited by jeryltan; 5th March 2006 at 10:00 AM.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by jeryltan
    1st time Iheard this..
    I consider the 50mm F1.8 a fast lens even though it's only $140 and not a pro series.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Actualli was thinking about getting a 50mm f 1.8 to try, its a cheaper 'fast' lens compared to those hi end zooms... the problem is the digital magnification of 1.5x will make the lens 75mm yup...

  18. #18

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by mazeppa26
    Actualli was thinking about getting a 50mm f 1.8 to try, its a cheaper 'fast' lens compared to those hi end zooms... the problem is the digital magnification of 1.5x will make the lens 75mm yup...
    get a 35mm f/2 then. it'll be more expensive than the 50mm f/1.8 though

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    810

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by roti_prata
    generally, fast lenses r better thn slower 1s. my tokina 28-80/2.8 is sharp by f4, can a 17-70/3.5-4.5 claim the same? wait, it cant even be f4 at tele.

    bottom line, fast lenses r the pro series of a manufacturer's line up. slower lenses r the consumer series.
    I agree!

  20. #20

    Default Re: Are FAST lens really good?

    Quote Originally Posted by surge
    at ISO400, a 35/f2 lens can give a 1/125 in a wet market( may vary due to ligthing in e market)

    if you are using a f4-5.6, the shutter is reduce to 1/60. even if you have very steady hands, the subj's movement is gonna blur your photo.
    I think in your example, at f4-f5.6, the shutter speed will be reduced to 1/30-1/15...?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •