![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
|
Hi,
Gonna buy a macro lens.... budget is below 600, anybody has some advice for these two lens? which one should I get? dont say BBB lah, since I am so pooor.... Also new to macro ....so not sure what I will shoot.... Please suggest something to me, thanks. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,383
|
which type of macro you want to shoot?
__________________
Nikon D150 | 25mm F0.7 | SB400 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Beyond Space-Time Continuum
Posts: 5,921
|
both are very good lenses as rated by the Japanese magazines. 60mm has very very low light falloff at the corners. But the 2 are of different range. Depending on what you are going to be shooting, it is very hard for others to recommend to you.
60mm Nikkor 90mm Tamron 100mm Tokina Would get the Nikkor 105 micro. Just add about 100 more and you have a more versatile macro lense.
__________________
Selling: 32GB Thumbdrive - Patriot Xporter XT 120sgd (Price reduced) |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 233
|
AF-S VR Macro N .. kekekeke
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 469
|
There's a few 105mm micro out there in B&S. Go grab them.
![]()
__________________
F5 D700 D200 S5Pro 10.5 18-200 20f2.8 35f2 50f1.4 105VR 200macro 24-70 70-200VR 300f4 TC1.7/2.0 |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,376
|
Both are very good lenses whose reputations are without reproach. Normally, people buy the Tamron 90mm to do both portrait and Macro work. For portraiture: If you are shooting digital then go for the 60 Micro bec it becomes a 90mm (ideal portraiture length). If you are shooting film, get the Tamron 90mm. It becomes a 135mm on a dSLR, you have to stand further away from your subject to get head and shoulders which makes it harder to interact with your subject. Having said this; is not that big a disadvantage. The Tamron has very good (creamy) bokeh compared to the 60 Micro. For Macro work, with the 90mm you can shoot from further away - which is good if you don't want to spook your subjects. i.e. insects etc etc. Last edited by Tetrode; 24th February 2006 at 07:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Astin Studio
Posts: 4,724
|
I would prefer the Nikon 60mm micro, then later when u have more money and interest, add the Nikon 105mm micro, then u would have a good pair of micro lens.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,536
|
since the thread starter does not know what to shoot with a macro lens, i would suggest that you do not buy now.
Last edited by reachme2003; 24th February 2006 at 08:07 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
|
but money is the big issue.. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
|
thanks very much for all the replies, especially those spent quite a while to write so long replies.
I think probably I will grab a nikkor 60mm in next week unless I can get the cheap price for tamron.... trying to dig the macro world... |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,376
|
Do a search on google on this lens and it will bring up pics taken with this lens. You will see how good the bokeh is on the lens. It is so good, a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit photographer uses it for his magazine and calender shots. BTW, Nikon subcontracts the manufacture of some of it's lenses to Tamron and Sigma. So what does that tell you? Last edited by Tetrode; 24th February 2006 at 07:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Little India
Posts: 1,885
|
I second this! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,383
|
__________________
Nikon D150 | 25mm F0.7 | SB400 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
|
it is juz personal feeling... got touched some bad lens before which gives me bad image on those lens...
I do not say it is bad. If it is bad, I wont consider to buy it... keep calm and I apologize for the misleading if there is any...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
|
normal behavior , is it? :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Little India
Posts: 1,885
|
since both are good lenses and both fits within your budget, then might as well get tamron 90mm. it has a longer working range for you to shoot macro and since u aren't sure what to shoot, that range fits u better.
and tamron 90mm has been featured as a legendary macro lens, world renowned for its outstanding optical performance and lightweight and compact design. it has been reviewed, tested and proven. so why hesistate? and if one day u decide to shoot portraits instead of macro, tamron 90mm is still good to go! |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,953
|
Just curious...
how much would the Tamron 90mm go for? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|