![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 1,482
|
People say that third party lens are not as good as original lens. Why don't we end this debate by comparing third party lens images to original manufaturers' lens. To make it less subjective we should decide on types of pictures that will not be subjected to bias.
Last edited by smtan24; 21st February 2006 at 11:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
28-80mm f4.5-5.6 (third party) against 28-70 f2.8 G (orginal)?? joking right?? egg and stone?? All lenses taken "good "pics, some just need to stop down a bit.. colors wise, thats where the diff comes in... ![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 1,482
|
You're right. We shouldn't compare high end lense of the manufacturer to releatively low end lens of third party. Comparison should be done on lens of similars specifications. Than compare the pictures and than make the conclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
Unless u can have lenses of identical focal/aperture range, then the comparison will be meaningful... there are lots of such comparisons in dpreview and dyxum.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|