ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > Newbies Corner

Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP.


 
Thread Tools
Old 15th February 2006   #1
RainbowSix
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ang Mo Kio, Singapore
Posts: 25
Default What 77mm polariser for Sigma 10-20mm EX DG

Hi,

I am thinking of getting a circular polariser for my sigma 10-20 lens (on my 350D body). I understand that because of the ultra wide angle, I need to use a slim filter in order to avoid vignetting? Does that mean for hoya, i need to get the Ultra thin or Pro 1 series?

Also, what is the difference betw a B+W 77mm Kaesemann Circular Polarizer Glass Filter Slim & B+W 77mm Circular Polarizer Glass Filter Slim?

Thank you!
RainbowSix is offline  
Old 15th February 2006   #2
RainbowSix
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ang Mo Kio, Singapore
Posts: 25
Default Re: What 77mm polariser for Sigma 10-20mm EX DG

Sorry, I meant Sigma 10-20mm EX DC.
RainbowSix is offline  
Old 16th February 2006   #3
yyD70S
Senior Member
 
yyD70S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,061
Default Re: What 77mm polariser for Sigma 10-20mm EX DG

The B+W Kaesemann filter is sealed around the edges. IE, the polarizing foils that do their job are sandwhiched between two layers of glass and can be suseptable to moisture. The Kaesemann version protects them.

However, I would suggest that if you are really into B+W, go for the MRC version. It's a newer version and the MRC coating is completely separate and is B+W's latest high scratch resistant coating. Easy to clean too!

Sorry, but I have not tried the Hoya series.
__________________
AI 16mm f3.5 | AiS 35mm f1.4 | AiS 50mm f1.2 | AI 105mm f2.5
yyD70S is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.04765 seconds with 7 queries