![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 282
|
This article says it all. Didn't know the minolta hi-matic was selected to go into space!
http://www.photoxels.com/history_minolta.html |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Teban Gardens
Posts: 2,610
|
There's a saying, "There's no point being creative or original with your work if you're not able to sell it.." (I think). Some marketing ad I saw that at Alan Photo SLCC which makes me go hmmmm.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,977
|
has km totally ceased production on its lenses and dynax digi cams? if so, does it mean that prices of these things will drop drastically?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
KM didn't say it cease its production, they only ceased the business in this area and sold to Sony a less than 50% portion.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Teban Gardens
Posts: 2,610
|
Back in the 80s during those film days, Nikon and Minolta were household names among those 'old-timers'. I used to listen to them brag about their equipment and how it helped them with their photography to capture those priceless moments. Now digital has changed much in the way people live. I just felt Minolta were a bit too slow to catch up with the rest. (In marketing terms of course) Anyway, OT a bit: what's so great about Canon consumer SLR bodies and how did they manage to sell so well? Something to think about. My 2 cents worth. Cheers! Last edited by hazmee; 12th February 2006 at 02:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 2,088
|
Their service and support doesn't seem to care as much either. Sometimes, it's really frustrating being loyal to a brand who doesn't seem to care about its users.
__________________
The synapseman uses Sony Alpha system & Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
2 WORDS.... no money..haha
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 160
|
I also read somewhere that due to this, Minolta lost funding to do their marketing - resulting in where they are today. On hindsight, they would still be at the top if they have the money and good marketing skills. Another contributing factor is of course Minolta entered the digital era too late. http://www.rkmc.com/Honeywell_v_Mino...ted_Result.htm Honeywell v. Minolta Related Links Represented Honeywell in a patent infringement case against Minolta involving patents on autofocus cameras. After a five-month trial, the jury awarded Honeywell $96.3 million. The case subsequently settled for $127.5 million. Additional litigation against other autofocus camera manufacturers resulted in total settlements of approximately $500 million. http://www.zaxis.com/successStories/...lvMinolta.aspx Honeywell, Inc. v. Minolta Camera Co., Ltd. Synopsis When Minolta introduced the Maxxum auto-focus camera line, it revolutionized the SLR camera industry with the first fully automatic camera. When Honeywell looked at the Maxxum camera’s auto-focus technology, it looked rather familiar. So familiar, in fact, that Honeywell filed a patent infringement lawsuit. Because of the complexity of the case, state-of-the-art technology was needed to aid the jury in understanding the technical and legal issues. Hired by Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi to represent Honeywell, Z-Axis produced extensive computer animations, photographs, videos and documents to be used in conjunction with numerous physical models built by Honeywell’s engineers. This was the first trial ever to use touch screen technology to present its exhibits. Z-Axis’ proprietary touch screen system enabled the trial team to assess all of its exhibits stored on videodisc at the touch of a finger. The visual tutorials and exhibits assisted Honeywell’s attorneys and experts explain their case for infringement to the jury. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...55C0A966958260 Minolta Move by Honeywell REUTERS Published: June 15, 1990 LEAD: Honeywell Inc. filed a complaint today with the International Trade Commission seeking to ban the import of Minolta cameras, saying the Japanese company uses autofocus technology developed by Honeywell. Honeywell Inc. filed a complaint today with the International Trade Commission seeking to ban the import of Minolta cameras, saying the Japanese company uses autofocus technology developed by Honeywell. The petition seeks a ban on importing Minolta cameras, including the successful Maxxum series, until Minolta agrees to licensing by Honeywell. The Minneapolis-based company also seeks payment of royalties from the Japanese camera maker. ''We would like to settle this case and to be compensated fairly for use of our technology,'' said Christofer J. Steffen, Honeywell's chief financial officer. The Minolta Corporation, the American unit of the Japanese company, said Honeywell's petition contained the same charges that have been the subject of litigation for more than three years. ''We believe the Honeywell patent claims in question are invalid and unenforceable,'' Minolta said, adding that Minolta of Japan was involved in ''pioneering efforts'' in developing autofocus cameras, along with several other companies. Minolta also accused Honeywell of violating a 1988 agreement that the patent dispute be resolved in a Federal court in New Jersey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,540
|
Fun to read but some inaccuracies.
How can a "history" miss out the fabulous XD7. No mention of XK ? Nothing on the VFC lens? No mention of Himatic 7s II ? Leica R3, R4, R5 made by Minolta ? !!!! Rubbish!!! The frame and metering electronics were contributed by Minolta. Whole Camera by Leica. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 282
|
Minolta is also the first to come up with body integral anti-shake mechanism in dslr--7D
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
![]()
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West
Posts: 315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washingtonk, DC, US
Posts: 2
|
Why the "Minolta" HiMatic in space?
As an afterthought, John Glenn wanted to take some souvenier photos from space - what were they thinking not to include photography in the original plans? Anyway, he saw the Ansco (oldest photo company in the US) camera built by Minolta at a local drug store, simple enough to operate, so NASA modified it to work with his gloves on. History. White Minolta 800si also went into space later, and Minolta also built a special "space meter" for NASA later. How the might have fallen - the original photo enthusiasm died off with the original Minolta people - geniuses in my book. The "managers" from recent Minolta BUSINESS history, and surprisingly even from Konica, an older photo company than Kodak even, couldn't understand all this "photo" stuff - so no marketing! Ouch! No enthusiasm from the top brass = dead or dying division! Click! Love and hugs, Peter Blaise Minolta Photographer http://www.peterblaisephotography.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washingtonk, DC, US
Posts: 2
|
Neither - it's the 8700i or 8000i- see http://www.jwhubbers.nl/mug/af-bodies.html
A special edition all-white 8000i was made, together with a white zoom lens and white 5200i flash; all three sold together as an outfit. Janusz "Frankie" Franczak (frankie@atcom.net.pl) wrote: As I know, pearl version of Dynax 8000i was produced between 1989 and 1991 (I thing, that was 1991, but I'm not sure). There was made amount 20000 pcs of "pearl "kits. (The "i" series was introduced in 1988, and when I was in Vienna in December 1992, I saw this camera in shop) Hoyin Lee, Hong Kong (leehoyin@hutchcity.com) wrote on 13 April 2001: That special edition 8000i (Alpha-8700i in Japan), sold with a white 5200i flash and a white AF 35-105mm f/3.5-4.5 lens, was released in December 1990 to commemorate the use of a similar Minolta model by Tokyo Broadcasting System (TBS) journalist Toyohiro Akiyama in the Russian space station Mir. ;-) My memory ... Click! Love and hugs, Peter Blaise Minolta Photographer http://www.peterblaisephotography.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
OPPS, it a 8000i white body, haha...there's no 8000si anyway??? cheers.. ![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 34
|
So....anymore incentive to purchase a minolta dslr? I'm a die-hard minolta fan too (owning dynax 7 and 800si and a200) and was considering purchasing D5 when the news came.
Honestly, I am not very confident of Sony and hence the future health of minolta mounts... Any opinion on this? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|