Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 37 of 37

Thread: Units and measurements in photography

  1. #21
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by sweat100
    As what catchlights have mentioned, the diagonal of the film format can be calculated by Pythagoras theorem width^2 + length^2 = diagonal ^2

    As for the R i think it might be rectangle. But then how big exactly 1 rectangle? I tried to cut the 4 rectangles up for a 4R but they dont match proportionally to all the various R sizes.
    I believe the R is just simply means rectangle, not S or Square.

    But, for what I know, for 16"20", 8"10", 4"5" all are 4:5 ratio, and you can cut
    4 pieces of 4"5" out of one pieces of 8"10"
    4 pieces of 8"10" out of one pieces of 16"20"

    and 4R is 2:3 ratio, same as S8R (8"12"), S10R (10"15"), 12"18"

    3R is 3.5:5 ratio, very close to 5R (4.9:7) but is half size of 5R

    6R is 6:8 ratio, also call 645 format.

    so the R do not really inter related here, unlike the A (A0, A1, A2, A3 etc)

  2. #22

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    All this while I tot R was refering to some darkroom magnification ratio or setting... tink I'm misled liao
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    2,548

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by LucidaM
    Don't they use R in Perth? In Thailand they use R too.
    I've never encountered R measurements at any Prolab outside of SE Asia, that includes the whole of Australia, Europe, South America and the USA, though as littlewolf said it is rarely used in the USA.
    The Ang Moh from Hell
    Professional Photography - many are called, few are chosen!

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    2,548

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights
    I remember in early days some labs offer 3S, 5S, the S here is referring to Square, so I believe that R is refer to Rectangular, like 5R (57), now if the S is in front of a digit, eg S8R, S10R, is referring to Super, so S8R also call Super 8R.
    A horrible thought just crossed my mind, one that goes back to my first travels in SE Asia as a kid in the mid 60s. The use of S for square and R for rectangular and a number could just have started off as a simple way of specifiying a print size in the same way that many restaraunts did and still do put a number next to the display item of the meal.
    The Ang Moh from Hell
    Professional Photography - many are called, few are chosen!

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    2,548

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights
    I believe the R is just simply means rectangle, not S or Square.

    But, for what I know, for 16"20", 8"10", 4"5" all are 4:5 ratio, and you can cut
    4 pieces of 4"5" out of one pieces of 8"10"
    4 pieces of 8"10" out of one pieces of 16"20"

    and 4R is 2:3 ratio, same as S8R (8"12"), S10R (10"15"), 12"18"

    3R is 3.5:5 ratio, very close to 5R (4.9:7) but is half size of 5R

    6R is 6:8 ratio, also call 645 format.

    so the R do not really inter related here, unlike the A (A0, A1, A2, A3 etc)
    Nice idea in theory, the only drawback is that most labs use roll paper that is slightly oversize and only trim the ends when printing.
    The Ang Moh from Hell
    Professional Photography - many are called, few are chosen!

  6. #26
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian
    Nice idea in theory, the only drawback is that most labs use roll paper that is slightly oversize and only trim the ends when printing.
    This part is I refering to sheet size, when I still do b/w work,
    But, for what I know, for 16"20", 8"10", 4"5" all are 4:5 ratio, and you can cut
    4 pieces of 4"5" out of one pieces of 8"10"
    4 pieces of 8"10" out of one pieces of 16"20"
    And yes, mini labs are using roll paper, they tell me that mostly using 5" paper (for 3R and 5R), 6" paper (for 4R and and 6R), 10" paper (for 8R, 10R and 10RW), 12" (for S8R and 12"18"), hope I remember correctly.

  7. #27
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian
    A horrible thought just crossed my mind, one that goes back to my first travels in SE Asia as a kid in the mid 60s. The use of S for square and R for rectangular and a number could just have started off as a simple way of specifiying a print size in the same way that many restaraunts did and still do put a number next to the display item of the meal.
    well, looks like it is the idea behind, should ask this to Kodak Labs.

  8. #28
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian
    I've never encountered R measurements at any Prolab outside of SE Asia, that includes the whole of Australia, Europe, South America and the USA, though as littlewolf said it is rarely used in the USA.
    most Prolab don't speacially do machin print, all they use sheet paper, and they call 3"5" instead of 3R, 5"7" instead of 5R..etc, and all are call "custom prints", allow cropping, burn in and dodging, these are the thing that can't do it on machine print (mini Lab), so basically the "R" or "S" are also refering print sizes use on machine print (mini Lab).

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pasir Ris, Singapore
    Posts
    14,002

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Wah...becoming so technical here
    Canon EOS 5D, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.2 L, 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS, 600EX-RT. Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 EX.

  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    West of S'pore
    Posts
    999

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    aint it all about the tech details.

  11. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    2,548

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights
    most Prolab don't speacially do machin print, all they use sheet paper, and they call 3"5" instead of 3R, 5"7" instead of 5R..etc, and all are call "custom prints", allow cropping, burn in and dodging, these are the thing that can't do it on machine print (mini Lab), so basically the "R" or "S" are also refering print sizes use on machine print (mini Lab).
    Most genuine pro labs I've dealt with world wide (and that is an awful lot) offer both machine prints (standard prints, roll paper) and custom prints (often called "commercial prints" hand done on sheet paper). The main difference with the pro lab machine prints is the pro labs use top end machinery and very experienced operators and fully adhere to the daily testing and calibration of their printers, unlike most minilab operators.
    The Ang Moh from Hell
    Professional Photography - many are called, few are chosen!

  12. #32
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography


    Yes, here not all pro lab offer machine print and "commercial prints" together, even not much pro labs in S'pore nowadays.

  13. #33
    Senior Member zoossh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,725

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights
    btw,


    (weight of format) + (length of format) = (focal length of Standard lens)


    eg. (24mm) +(36mm) = (43.27mm) , so we use 50mm as normal lens for 35mm format.
    dun mind if i ask? is it weight or is it width? if it is weight, what does it mean?

  14. #34
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by zoossh
    dun mind if i ask? is it weight or is it width? if it is weight, what does it mean?
    ooppsss, typo error, is (width of format) + (length of format) = (focal length of Standard lens)

  15. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Adam Rd, Singapore
    Posts
    506

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by madmacs
    that formula you should have learnt in school leh...length of hypotenus (how you spell this freaking thing?).
    hypotenusa...

  16. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Adam Rd, Singapore
    Posts
    506

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights
    ooppsss, typo error, is (width of format) + (length of format) = (focal length of Standard lens)
    Phytagoras triangle??

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pasir Ris, Singapore
    Posts
    14,002

    Default Re: Units and measurements in photography

    More like Pythagoras Theorem LOL
    Canon EOS 5D, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 50 f/1.2 L, 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS, 600EX-RT. Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 EX.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •