![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,619
|
Comparison between the following three lens on Minolta 5D.
1. KM 24-85 f3.5 - 4.5 2. KM 18-70 f3.5 - 5.6 3. Sigma 18-125 f3.5-5.6 The selected f-stop for comparison are selected based on the widest aperture available on all lens being compared. All photos taken on tripod, with remote cable release and 2 seconds timer with mirror-lockup. All are 100% crop and the first row of each pictures are from the center of the photo. Row 2 and 3 are taken closer to the edge. Not sure why the photo takens on the KM 18-70 on the same focal length are slightly different from the rest. In term of sharpness, the KM 24-85 is the best among the three. As for the Sigma, it's better at the longer focal length than at it's wide angle. Comparing the SIGMA against the KM 18-70, the SIGMA lose out on edge sharpness. The center sharpness is very close to the KM 18-70 on wide, but better on the longer focal length. Test photo here ---> http://www.pbase.com/tkm/lens_test_1 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 827
|
the minolta 24-85 has been traditionally a sharp lens for it's price...
![]() too bad the crop factor massacred its wide angle capability... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 12
|
Thanks for doing the lens comparison test. I sold off my kit lens for the Sigma. It's a pity the 24-85 is too long on the wide end, otherwise it'd be a very good walkabout lens.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,619
|
The KM24-85 is not too bad on the DSLR in my opinion, as compare to 28-xx. But then it depends a lot on individual shooting style as well.
The SIGMA has great coverage but suffer edge sharpness quality at it's wide side. It's sufficient when you do not intend to do large print or viewing 100% on the monitor. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 243
|
Nice test ... I will be keen to see how the KM24-85 compare against KM 28-75 and KM 28-135 ..
I could probably give that a go if not for the lack of a digital body. If you are interested to run this test, do let me know. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok Reservoir
Posts: 880
|
I remember reading a review between Nikon, Canon, Contax and Minolta's 24-85mm lenses. Minolta was best in center sharpness and worst in corner sharpness.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,619
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|