![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 105
|
FZ30 purple fringe & corner sharpnest better than 350D? Due to better lens? Quite amazing!
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Fu...00/page4.shtml |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SGee
Posts: 1,568
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 105
|
Then i think they should not bundle, just sell the body and consumer would benefit.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,843
|
lets hope panasonic can come up with a dslr
hope only lar. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pinnacle, Duxton (future)
Posts: 624
|
Check this out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bt Batok
Posts: 769
|
the 350d can be bought body-only.
i think the greatest drawback of the 4/3 system(which panasonic will adopt) is the lack of lenses. so far only sigma announced a consumer(meaning not pro) 4/3 lens that adds to the very limited selection of oem lenses offered by olympus. i dont mean that dslr users must hav 10 or 20 lenses but its always better to be able to choose from many oem and 3rd party lenses/accessories. the extensive system of bodies, lenses and accessories that canon and nikon(and sigma/tokina/tamron) offer gave them the 90% dslr market dominance. Last edited by roti_prata; 2nd February 2006 at 05:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,843
|
but as roti_prata has said, which is correct imo, is that the 4/3 system lacks lenses. but i think giving it some time and it should grow, now panasonic has joined in the dslr bandwagon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,951
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SGee
Posts: 1,568
|
a 12X FZ lense will b so ideal (small, & so fun 2 zoom end - end)...
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|