Some recent nature photos (gallery updated)

[tomshen]

Not many, trying to be selective. More on my website.

[Horus]

wow! where do u get all those amazing shotS?!

hey do users normally do post-editing wiff an imaging software before they post it up? many of the shots look damn good !

[ninelives]

was the Siberian tiger taken from singapore?? i tot singapore only got white tiger.

[tomshen]

Quote: Originally posted by ninelives was the Siberian tiger taken from singapore?? i tot singapore only got white tiger.

Trick here, get a bottle of paint and a brush, sneak up when the white tiger was sleeping, paint it carefully... u must take a bath before u do so, in case the smell of your fresh is too attractive...

[tomshen]

Quote: Originally posted by Horus wow! where do u get all those amazing shotS?! hey do users normally do post-editing wiff an imaging software before they post it up? many of the shots look damn good !

Taken in zoo, botanic garden, and JBP. Some usually postprocessing is required, mainly to increase a bit brightness/contrast/sharpness etc.

[MatthewSCL]

Hi Tom, Still remember me? I am a friend of Paul, met you at the Taka Fashion Show?
Anyway, just want to find out hows the performance of your Sigma 70-200 f2.8?

Cos saw your pics....the background is really out of forcus and the potos are really sharp!...

so was wondering if its due to post editing or because of the lens.
Superb picture you have....

Thanks.

Best Regards
Matthew

[tomshen]

Quote: Originally posted by MatthewSCL Hi Tom, Still remember me? I am a friend of Paul, met you at the Taka Fashion Show? Anyway, just want to find out hows the performance of your Sigma 70-200 f2.8? Cos saw your pics....the background is really out of forcus and the potos are really sharp!... so was wondering if its due to post editing or because of the lens. Superb picture you have.... Thanks. Best Regards Matthew

None of the shots were taken with my Sigma 70-200, though the dragonfly was taken with megaweb's Canon 70-200 + 500D. The other four were taken with Sigma 50-500. but Sigma 70-200 is a good performer.

[azone]

Nice collection of pics you have, tom!