![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 396
|
Dear everyone,
I am tired of carrying my E-300 around sometimes and would like to hv a versatile and reasonably priced pro-consumer camera. Something small to fit into handbag/tote but yet at the same time, produce good results under day/night conditions. Do you guys have any suggestion? Feel free to suggest any other cameras (even non-Olympus ones) Price is important (hope not to spend too much on it) ![]() Thanks in advance ![]() Last edited by serene; 15th January 2006 at 02:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,956
|
Hi serene, are these your only choices? I am not sure if the C8080WZ is still available but last saw them on clearance at CP. I am not sure whether it is that much smaller than your E-300 though.
I can't say much for the latest Oly compacts as I have not tried them out. The C7070WZ would have been a great choice given its nice 27mm wide end, performance and compact dimensions but sadly has been discontinued. The C-70 is actually on clearance at CP for only S$658 last time I check and those on dpreview who have one say it is a pocket gem. If not for its not so wide 38mm, I would have snag one as a pocket cam. I am currently considering the Fujifilm F11, but not sure if its 35mm on the wide end will suit my usage... yes, I am a wide angle junkie. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 3,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lion City
Posts: 350
|
Hi Serene, if you want something small...than C8080 is out. It is also a bulky as E-300. Not something that can put in a pocket or handbag.
__________________
HarmonyPhotoGallery |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 396
|
I heard that the Coolpix is about same size as Oly c8080wz. Does any know which P&S gives the best performance for one who has been spoilt by quality of DSLR. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,956
|
![]() Serene, I have tried to get a prosumer to carry around in place of my DSLR and all I can say is that I am underwhelmed by speed, the image quality and distortion. When you have it so good, nothing except the real deal comes closed which was why I changed to a E-500, which is compact and light enough to carry around. Just need that pocket P&S with wide angle! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 3,023
|
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=171712 http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=171707 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 131
|
![]() tao: i see why you have the 11-22 now. a very nice lens to have handy indoors especially. and i agree that many times when i'm using my prosumer i'll be wishing that i had my e1 along. the speed, feel and quality is so different. but of cos there are many places and situations where a p&s would be a better choice despite this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 747
|
the Ricoh GR-D is not bad.
![]() 28mm & fits into your pocket. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,956
|
You are indeed right that there are times when a P&S is preferred... I don't relish lugging the E-500+11-22mm around when I go for site inspection even though it is the camera to carry around for best results. That is why a pocket-size P&S with at least 28mm is preferred but hope it don't break the bank like the Ricoh GR-D, I will rather spend the extra money on another Zuiko Digital lens. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 747
|
yeah .. my piggy bank is broken liao.. haiz.. the 7070 was a nice cam, but oly EOL it ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|