|
|
|
|||||||
| Canon Exhilaration Of Sight |
|
|
| View Poll Results: 24-105L as a walkaround lens... is it worth the money? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
88 | 49.16% |
| No, there're better options out there. |
  
|
91 | 50.84% |
| Voters: 179. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
6th January 2006
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,186
|
24-105L... is it worth the money?
I'm looking for a good walkaround lens.
One of my options is the new 24-105L (without the flare). Just wondering if it's worth the buy... if not, what do you propose? |
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore, CanonGraphers.org
Posts: 3,163
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
28-300mmf3.5-5.6L IS USM.
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 1,637
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
I suppose if you are using a 5D it makes sense. otherwise it is not quite wide enough to qualify for walkaround. But I think it should be priced closer to about $1,600.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 2,143
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
 Last edited by Canew; 6th January 2006 at 11:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore, CanonGraphers.org
Posts: 3,163
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
 ...But anyway...the 28-300mm is generally a better ''walkabout'' lens...quality aside. Anyway...I havent got the chance to play around with the 24-105mm...but I would still go for the 24-70...unless they make the 24-105 a constant f2.8...  |
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 1 Dalvey Road
Posts: 479
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
bro, a little too heavy, don't u think so? jude |
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 2,143
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
The 24-105 has IS. That will help 3 stops. You still want f/2.8 for that? |
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore, CanonGraphers.org
Posts: 3,163
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
I like carrying heavy lenses...heavy means quality. actually, so far the best walkard lens that appeals to me is the 17-85mmIS  |
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore, CanonGraphers.org
Posts: 3,163
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
 |
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tampines
Posts: 2,143
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
 Can't get that with IS.Last edited by Canew; 6th January 2006 at 11:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
6th January 2006
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore, CanonGraphers.org
Posts: 3,163
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
 |
|
|
|
|
7th January 2006
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 263
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
17-85 IS is generally a good walkaround lens, especially for those using EFS mount camera. But for extra range and Canon "L" quality, one may go for the 24-105 L IS lens which is a lot more ex than 17-85 ~ about twice ... You decide what you want and the range that you want and what you can afford
|
|
|
|
7th January 2006
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,279
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
$2000++++ for an f/4 lens is a waste of money to me. The 70-200/4L is about half the price.
|
|
|
|
7th January 2006
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
not worth for an f4 and zooming barrel
|
|
|
|
8th January 2006
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,186
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
Seems like I'm not getting good overall positive response for this lens.
Anyone can recommend alternative? The range I'm looking for is between 35 ~ 70. Looking for a quality build and quality output lenses. Max aperture : F4. Max affordable price: SGD2200 I had initially considered the 24~70L F2.8, but the 24~105L F4 has IS to offset it's aperture disadvantage (Not considering the DOF). |
|
|
|
8th January 2006
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Beyond Space-Time Continuum
Posts: 5,924
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
You could get the 24-105L under 2.2k if from overseas, but they are seriously out of stock. The 24-70 would be a good choice too. Seen a couple on the 2nd hand shelves already.
__________________
Selling: 32GB Thumbdrive - Patriot Xporter XT 120sgd (Price reduced) |
|
|
|
8th January 2006
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Serangoon United
Posts: 289
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
Hi, like to ask which country sell lens cheaper Japan or Hong Kong?
|
|
|
|
8th January 2006
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pasir Ris
Posts: 1,281
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
|
|
|
|
|
8th January 2006
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bt. Timah
Posts: 1,375
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
Ironic right? But its to be expected. $2K+ for a lens is beyond the budget of most amateurs. Also everyone's commenting based on their own shooting styles... who know maybe the 24-105 might be just right for you! Last edited by solarii; 8th January 2006 at 05:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
8th January 2006
|
#20 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 24
|
Re: 24-105L... is it worth the money?
Overseas lowest price is around S$1900 ~ tax free (i got mine for S$1750 with canon redemptions), any lower, have to go hongkong. Will vouch for the 24-105 F4 L as the better walk about lens than 24-70, have it for over a month now, tried and tested on 5d and 20d (weight ratio on a 350d not as good) and with IS, its more usable esp outdoors. Preferentially, indoor event shooters would prefer F2.8, but if you are always on a go... that lens is perfect. Besides, all my indoor shots of girls (see my posts) are with this lens... |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
