![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 12
|
how come all the ppl here are talking abt f11 but there are so little discussion on z2. for me i find z2 design are more attactive but how is the function compare to f11? any difference?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 253
|
It is just like normal ultra slim cam, only good at ISO 100 or lower, ISO 200 still usable but starting to show the noise reduction effect. In this case, if size not an issue, F11 is a much better camera for about the same price.I took some pics at MS Color, please have a look, the ISO used indicated in the file name, the first few digits. Sorry for the handshake of ISO 100 sample FinePix Z2 FinePix F11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 385
|
Anyway that means the S5200 isn't too good at noise too? It uses the same sensor as the Z2.
The F11 has more manual controls than the Z2 for the creative budding photographer. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 781
|
the Z2 only has F3.5... rather slow
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|