i guess i missed a word,Originally Posted by foxtwo
that's 'need' between 'u' n 'violence'.
n after reading it again,
i still belief that its a question in rhetoric.
if u want to look at it otherwise,
like u say, everything 'leaves a lot to be intepreted'.
can only read 2 of them,
and find that they both leave a bitter aftertaste.
the way things r written in those articles,
eg. telling how hanging was used by which countries b4 the turn of the
century, hilter re-introduced it, blah blah blah,
r all very pretensious kind of fair comparison,
i used it all the time with my kids.
not telling u directly that its outdated,
barbaric nor unkind, yet leads u there nevertheless.
its only fair if they show on whom we used this method on.
the kind of destruction these pple caused.
there, i guessed i said my piece
and i hope u understand that i wasn't refering to u,
guesssed it was fatigue this morning.