![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 336
|
Has anyone tested these cameras side by side
1) as far as the bodies themselves go are there any significant differences (DOF preview, SD cards, commander mode flash and second wheel not withstanding. Is there a difference in image quality? Metering and AF performance?) 2) Can anyone post pics of taken with the 2 cameras using the same lens and similar settings? 3) How does the D50 perform in actual shooting conditions (as opposed to studio tests). How is its low light / flash assisted performance? 4) Why do both lack an ISO 100 setting? Can anyone recommend one over the other (easy to say go for D70s, question is is it worth the extra $400 or would that money be better spent towards offsetting part of the cost of a good lens). Thank you. This question has been bugging me for a couple of months now and most of the reviews on the net are completely useless in this regards. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,344
|
.
. . .
__________________
Tamron lenses sale for Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Sony/minolta, MF(Adaptall 2) |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 188
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The 3rd Rock
Posts: 1,272
|
1. Both D70s and D70 use CAM900 AF module, but I notice D50 is slightly faster than D70s, when tested with the same lens. 2. - 3. - 4. Why no ISO 100? I don't know. But there are alternative software to denoise the pic, so not a big issue to me. 5. Is it worth the extra $400? Well, what are your needs? Are those extra features in D70s critical to you? if not, else get D50. BTW, I'm a D70 user and happy with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Image quality, yes, I can see noticeable differences in the NEF (raw) files when I opened a D50 and D70 file. Metering is the same, if you know how to meter, it works perfectly. AF performance is dependant on the Cam module. I don't see much difference between the two.
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tanjong Katong
Posts: 3,726
|
Last time people used to ASA100 Film. When the technology allowed for better grain in ASA200, they introduce ASA200 Film for better indoor picture. Afterthat ASA400 Film come out. This also true for sensor technology (CCD or CMOS) for digital camera. Don't be surprise if in the few years later there are ASA400-ASA6400 dSLR .Regards, Arto. Last edited by Artosoft; 25th November 2005 at 02:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asylum, Ward 4444
Posts: 2,132
|
DSLR have ISO6400.
D2Hs lor ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Yep, I find the D70 outperforming the D50 in the output for NEF. D50's exposure seems to be more spot on however, the -0.3 standard for Nikon SLRs seem to have dissappeared in D50 without blowing the highlights. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 336
|
I dont know if I am doing something wrong or that I have not used the right cameras till now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 336
|
What are the differences (noise or sharpness issues)? Is the D70s better or the other way round? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Another reason might be the VF was not designed to be very bright so stepping down further made it darker and hard to see. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 336
|
I am a little unclear, are you supposed to see the effect of the reduced aperture when you press the DOF button and then release or are you supposed to press and hold it down to see what happens. I have tried both the FM10 and the Konica Minolta 5D, but all I see is a dark viewfinder with not much visible. Could the issue be that I tried both indoors. Are DOF previews more effective outdoors (more light?). |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
When the aperture ring is stepped down on the DOF preview button's depression, the amount of light that actually enters the len is shown in the VF, if it's dark, this is how the image will turn out if you release the shutter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 294
|
i had a similar thread a few weeks ago. go look it up.
anyway visit www.imaging-resource.com they have done up a pretty intensive report on the image quality of the D50 vs D70s. both has its pros and cons. one is sharp and slightly noiser. the other is slightly less sharp but less noisy as well. Dynamic range is debatable. Almost no difference if u ask me. I have seen alot of sample pictures from dpreview.com. Please note although what many people say, D50 uses a slightly different CCD from D70s. As you may have guessed, yes i bought the D50 in the end.
__________________
www.reivad.net |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 336
|
Thanks Reiv.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 336
|
I bougght the D50 kit earlier today. Now trying to swap the lens with a 18-70 lens (with a top up from me).
I got a good offer and bought the kit at Cathay. I am still wondering if I should buy the 55-200 lens for $200. Its supposed to be a pretty good lens and it is reasonably priced, but it cannot be used with any film bodies. Any other telephoto lens recommendations? I am going through the other posts but if any of you come across anything, I would really appreciate the heads up. Thank you so much. Krishna |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 302
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|