![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,399
|
I was checking my lenses today becase the results i got for my 80-200 APG g and my 28-75 d were not as good as i had hoped with certain subjects. I get the Focus chart from a website (the one that tells u to focus on the center thick line and looks like a ruler on both sides. My other lenses are ok but these 2, the "infocus" area is MUCH bigger in from of the line than behind the thick line. This means "front focus" right? e.g 40mm in focus in front, 10mm in focus behind (before it gets blury) all test done with tripod and flash and wide open. trip to servicing center for me? The 28-75 only gives me sharp pics stopped down to f4 but i heard so much good stuff abt this lense that i dont beleive that to be the way it should be.
ugh! Last edited by captnj; 20th November 2005 at 12:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 37º47'S, 114º58'E
Posts: 278
|
I did the test on 3 of my lenses and the above holds true for my 28-100mm at 100mm. No front or back focus issues with my 7D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,399
|
![]() here is the pic for my 28-75mm minolta 2.8 D... ![]() here is the 80-200APO G ![]() just for comparison, below is the 17-35 f4 (d) at 35mm wide open ![]() Last edited by captnj; 20th November 2005 at 12:39 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
its much easier to tell if you show a 100% crop.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bedok
Posts: 995
|
The 17-35 at f/4 has more DOF. But all of them showed more DOF in front than the back. It may not matter much since the point in question is still in focus. You might want to send it in if you feel uneasy.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
The 28-75 seems a little off... the 'focus here' part is little fuzzy but the 10mm mark is very sharp... the 80-200 cannot tell, too small while the 17-35 is spot on... actually for the 28-75 is it that bad... unless maybe u are doing really large macros the slight off focus cannot be seen right even in enlarged portraiture shots?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,399
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|