![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
|
Hi all,
Can I ask experts here, how crucial is the KM (D) lens which KM claims only functions well with its ADI. Does it mean that if I were to use any other normal or 3rd party lens (eg Sigma and Tamron) the ADI will not calculate the distance for flash photos??? I m only currently having a old Minolta xi 28-105 AF, so far it is doing alright! But I m planning to get a Sigma 12-24. If its that crucial, then i'll have to get the Minolta's 17-35 F/2.8 ~ 4 D. Any advise is much appreciated. Thx. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
TTL will take over instead of ADI.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,399
|
i hardly use straight flash... always diffused or bouncing... so D doesnt mean much to me in real life.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,399
|
ttl is pretty good... unless we are shooting an object that reflects alot of light. (this is in the manual) then ADI becomes useful... but then agian with such easy manual exposure/flash compensation dials/menu... its not a big issue
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
|
Can keep the money for the SP90mm instead. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,399
|
ya good ... lense more impt
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 812
|
ADI is useful, but not critical. For ADI to work, you'll need lens, body and flash to all have ADI function. If any of the 3 are non ADI, you don't expect ADI to come into play. If you are using advanced bodies like D7, you can specify if you want ADI, TTL 4 seg metering or TTL average reading.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 37º47'S, 114º58'E
Posts: 278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
Yes. Works the same way as the 7D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
Non KM lens with ADI? I think only Sigma? Or maybe dun have even... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 37º47'S, 114º58'E
Posts: 278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
Here're the list of lenses from Sigma and Tamron. You can browse through their catalogues.
Take for example, Sigma 28-105mm f/2.8-4, scroll to the bottom, it says: Corresponding AF Mounts SIGMA, CANON, NIKON (D), MINOLTA, PENTAX so this lens is has no D. Another example, Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4, scroll to the bottom, it says: Corresponding AF Mounts SIGMA, CANON, NIKON (D), PENTAX, MINOLTA (D) so, this lens has D. Edit: I forgot that Tamron website do not list if Minolta mount lenses have D. You can download the PDF catalogue here, which is a bit old but they do state those that are suppose to have D. Last edited by Drudkh; 19th November 2005 at 05:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 37º47'S, 114º58'E
Posts: 278
|
The Tamron site does state "Minolta-D" mounts, e.g., SP 11-18mm F/4.5-5.6 Di II LD Asp IF, 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di II and (whew!) SP 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro 1:1. But some like the reputable SP 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Asp IF does not have D, which is either a) surprising, or b) website is wrong . |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
![]() Lenses refurbished/redesigned/changed for DSLRs of equivalence Sigma = DC Tamron = Di Minolta = DT Edit: After reading from Sigma's website, here's the quote about their DG lenses.
Last edited by Drudkh; 19th November 2005 at 05:43 PM. |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|