Page 84 of 99 FirstFirst ... 3459747982838485868994 ... LastLast
Results 1,661 to 1,680 of 1973

Thread: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

  1. #1661
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by scanner
    Err.. I'm comparing AFS lens, not AFD.
    I know. Me dun have AFd. Me have AFs

  2. #1662
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Asylum, Ward 4444
    Posts
    2,095

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by sykestang
    Told you before. DX lenses and TCs cannot buy from HK!!! TC cost $600+ in HK and DX lens cost the same, if not more ex!!!
    alamak...

    i senile old man lah.....
    dun so angry leh...

    i scared scared.....

  3. #1663
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by scanner
    Please go and read, I'm referring to AFS 70-200and AFS 80-200. Can AFS 70-200 mounted with Tamron 1.4X? How about Tamron 2X?
    Think the AFS can use the Kenko telepro plus. but not the older ones. that is IIRC

  4. #1664
    Senior Member jnet6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    not here often anymore
    Posts
    8,169

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by edwinywh
    at the end of tonight.. still no conclusion which is a good tele for me.Hmmm....
    There is AF-S 70-200 VR....
    why?

    AF-S 80-200 - comfirm no new stock, unless for 2H.
    120-300 sigma - over yr budget.
    AF-S 300 - can consider.
    very easy...

  5. #1665
    Senior Member sykestang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    studiospace
    Posts
    5,550

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by scanner
    Please go and read, I'm referring to AFS 70-200and AFS 80-200. Can AFS 70-200 mounted with Tamron 1.4X? How about Tamron 2X?
    Stop your nonsense here. I am not interested in Tamron TC nor Sigma TC. Why would one degrade the lens to mount a 3rd party TC anyway.

    You are still wrong even if the Tamron 2x cannot be mounted as I have already proof to you that the 70-200 can indeed be mounted on a sigma TC!
    Visit me at my studio: http://www.studiospace.com.sg

  6. #1666
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by edwinywh
    at the end of tonight.. still no conclusion which is a good tele for me.Hmmm....
    better within the budget lens,

    100-300/4 or 120-300/2.8

    Former: Cheap with good reviews generally

    Latter: Faster but heard not true 300mm, a little short changed on the tele end.

  7. #1667
    Senior Member jnet6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    not here often anymore
    Posts
    8,169

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by scanner
    Please go and read, I'm referring to AFS 70-200and AFS 80-200. Can AFS 70-200 mounted with Tamron 1.4X? How about Tamron 2X?
    Ok la.. all use nikons...
    nothing else, so no more argument!

  8. #1668
    Senior Member acidbyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    4 me 2 know & 4 u 2 find out.
    Posts
    890

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    I was sleeping so peacefully when i can "hear" the argument happening here. So decide to peek in and see what is going on.
    mOi bLoG - "i bLoG, dO yOu?"

  9. #1669
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by TMC
    better within the budget lens,

    100-300/4 or 120-300/2.8

    Former: Cheap with good reviews generally

    Latter: Faster but heard not true 300mm, a little short changed on the tele end.
    Edwin, get the 70-200 lar

  10. #1670
    Senior Member jnet6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    not here often anymore
    Posts
    8,169

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by TMC
    Edwin, get the 70-200 lar
    the one lens that u will not regret.

  11. #1671

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by TMC
    Edwin, get the 70-200 lar
    well......... maybe will give it a try... MAYBE

  12. #1672
    Senior Member jnet6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    not here often anymore
    Posts
    8,169

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by acidbyte
    I was sleeping so peacefully when i can "hear" the argument happening here. So decide to peek in and see what is going on.
    well, let's just say use original nikkor.
    has the fire been put out??

  13. #1673
    Senior Member jnet6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    not here often anymore
    Posts
    8,169

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Back to slp...
    gd nite everyone!

  14. #1674
    Senior Member sykestang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    studiospace
    Posts
    5,550

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by AcidByte
    I was sleeping so peacefully when i can "hear" the argument happening here. So decide to peek in and see what is going on.
    *Hoot* *Hoot*
    Your baby is with me...
    Last edited by sykestang; 20th November 2005 at 02:00 AM.
    Visit me at my studio: http://www.studiospace.com.sg

  15. #1675
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    tang: what is that baby?

  16. #1676
    Senior Member sykestang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    studiospace
    Posts
    5,550

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    If you want, let me know by calling 96456423... I found another 2pcs here.
    Visit me at my studio: http://www.studiospace.com.sg

  17. #1677
    Senior Member sykestang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    studiospace
    Posts
    5,550

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by TMC
    tang: what is that baby?
    His 'product' together with FB lah!!! You're still underage just like Jnet6 to understand...
    Visit me at my studio: http://www.studiospace.com.sg

  18. #1678
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    yeah right. btw your sens dun have compilation leh. CD have to get separate too.

  19. #1679

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    Quote Originally Posted by sykestang
    Stop your nonsense here. I am not interested in Tamron TC nor Sigma TC. Why would one degrade the lens to mount a 3rd party TC anyway.

    You are still wrong even if the Tamron 2x cannot be mounted as I have already proof to you that the 70-200 can indeed be mounted on a sigma TC!
    What nosense? If you have problem with me, why don't we deal it personally.
    Lets take it offline here!

    As for the tamron teleconverter, TMC might be right on the new one can mount with AFS 70-200. But I'm sure and he is right that the old one can't because of the Protruding rear elements on the tamron teleconverter.
    Last edited by scanner; 20th November 2005 at 02:12 AM.

  20. #1680
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: Sentosa Thread XXXI (31) - alechim 30:187 "..its 8fps (8 fries per sec)"

    sian.....so much fire in here and no fire fighters around.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •