![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
i bought this nearly 6mths ago n yet to conduct a test on it.(played around it in the rm only).
any1 have the chance to use this cam? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
I've used this cam for the past three months, currently just upgraded to CP5700.
U can check out my Photo Gallery to see shots that I've taken using this cam. A good cam I must say ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
wow
great stuff u got there! do u know how to use the CSM function? I used auto most of the time as i cant figure out the functions or the pics r mosty blurred ![]() any advise? |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
I've been using the CSM mode all the while. Personally find that the CSM mode produces better picture as compared to the auto or preset mode. I usually use full manual for the exposure, so that I can play ard with different settings to create my intended shots. Wat kind of advise are u looking for?? using the CSM mode?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
the thing is i'm still a newbie with a cam..
i guess any advise would b nice ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
Viewfinder
i need to know if there's any diff if i lower down the image size to xga(1024x768) but maintains the image quality @ Fine?? my image size is usually set @ full(2048x1536) how much pic quality will i lose? |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
just as i thought. need to swtich to lower setting for more pics taking ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 760
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
went to the bay to take pics of the merlions.
PS:i hate the zoom esp when i need to fine tune.grrrrrr |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
http://www.pbase.com/syc77/30102002
i took out the bad ones. got questions for the bad ones too. hate the zoom cos i need to "tab" the zoom keys bit by bit just to get what i want into the view ![]() btw any good tripod for 885? i found that my hands shake alot ![]() Last edited by syc77; 1st November 2002 at 12:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
Hi syc77, I guess the program is that u have taken the shots using program mode and the type of metering. I presumed the sky was much brighter then rite?? Do u have program previewing your shots under that kind of condition?? If yes, i think u r going thru the same problem as me when I first got the cam. If u want to use program mode for these shots, u might have to give EV compensation for it. I must say the Merlion shot is not very easy. I did ask a question at hwz abt having a nice exposure on the Merlion landscape without getting the merlion body overexposed. It's kinda tough.
Your night shots are pretty good. One trick when taking nite shots with 885 or other DCs is to keep your hand on the cam, even after u have release the shutter. Cos the movement of your hand from the shutter after it has been released will create unnecessary motion and thus causing the shot to be blurred. |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
the night was cloudly. "I must say the Merlion shot is not very easy" meaning good/bad? n which shot? erm.... i did not use "program mode" @ all.(dont trust it) i was using Auto all the way. i only played with the Flash function. mostly i used Slow or even no FLash. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
As for the Merlion shots, I personally think the DSCN0098 is nicely exposure, as compared to the rest (DSCN0085~DSCN0104). Altho' the top of the Merlion is kinda dark, but comparing the lighting on the body with DSCN0104, u can see that the detail on DSCN0104 is totally washed out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
when u said about program mode,i though u were talking about the scene mode.me bad. as for DSCN0098,the prob lies with the way the lighting was shining on the merlion.all the lighting that's shining on it r about waist height of the merlion.that's y the head is is quite dark. me going to the car show now. later dude ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 491
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 768
|
SIAN~!
more than 75% of the cars i took r blur ![]() mayb it's bcos i dont use flash? but the good news. more than 65% of the car "babes" survived~! results. Failed. therefore,I'm not going to u/l the pics. Last edited by syc77; 3rd November 2002 at 12:36 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|