![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
|
Hi to all Olympus experts here, I'm new to digital cameras but have been doing quite a lot of research on the net for my new cams (websites include dpreview, pbase, and of course clubsnap!), intending to buy one soon and use it for daily photographing.
I have preference for real life colours. Some forumers mentioned that Olympus cams are good for their real life colours performance. I've seen some sample pics from the web and it's quite appealing, I love real colour more than anything else. I particularly liked the E500, but it's over my budget. Can you recommend any Olympus cams which is ~$500 and provide quite decent performance? I haven't know Olympus cams very well so would really appreciate a quick guide into this brand! Thanks for any advice and cheers. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,951
|
Hi, are you buying just a P&S compact or a camera with manual functions? Maybe it is good if you can let us know your 'technical' needs so that a camera can be recommended. Also, are you buying used or brand new?
By the way, it is true that Olympus colour is something quite special, it has that 'punchy lifelike colour' without being oversaturated like some other makes. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
|
Thanks for your reply. Yeah I have seen other cams, just feel that most of them are kind of lacking in something or over emphasising on something in terms of colour... which my humble experience think it isn't quite right (say fujifilm, the rich colour initially look wow, then after a while it doesn't grow on me as nothing in the real life will be that rich - kind of redish in colour). Until I saw E500's pics and further search on Olympus cams, then found out that this is probably what I wanted.
![]() Well for my need of this cam, it should be ~$500, and I need to take picture of people at indoor preferably without flash (as I don't want the kind of washout no background effect). Thus would say it should be good at low-light condition. And of course I want good real-life colour. Oh yes, a P&S will be fine, buying brand new. Any recommendation? |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,951
|
Hi, if you are looking for a compact, I will suggest you get one with manual functions to get more creative control over your picture taking.
Right now, the latest SP310 looks very good to me. $500 can't get you much but should be able to get you this. If you can fork out more, check out the SP350 but likely way out of your budget. You can check it out here: If you want something more slim and compact, literally a P&S, check out the i:robe IR-300. I have seen images posted at DPreview by users of it and they looks great. Colours is as brilliant as we will expect from Olympus and macro mode is amazing. Check it out here. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sg
Posts: 692
|
since u wanna shoot afap w/o flash maybe can look for a 2nd hand c5050? which has a f1.8 lens.. or the mju 800 which has iso 1600....
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
|
I couldn't resist but to post this: the samples for 'other lens' for e500 at dpreview is simply, perfect...
If I can have the budget this cam will be the best choice... BTW does anyone knows what 'other lens' at dpreview means, what lens exactly are they using? Simply superb... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
|
Now I got it, the focal length x-x mm shown in dpreview is related to the zuiko digital olympus lens (other than the kit lens given) used in taking their 'other lens' samples. Correct me if wrong...
And the few photos that I liked most in dpreview is taken by the 35-100mm lens. The 40-150mm kit lens however still doesn't look that good to me compared to the 35-100mm... just from the samples seen no professional comparison though. Just wondering how much are the 35-100mm... At most if budget allows get the original e500 + 14-45mm kit lens, then buy the 35-100mm lens... (I must be dreaming...) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
|
just saw from the other thread for the pricelist of zuiko lens the 35-100mm lens cost 4k+...!
no wonder they looks so good. but way over my budget la this undoubtly is an expensive hobby... ![]() Last edited by audiobean; 28th October 2005 at 11:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NE Singapore
Posts: 405
|
Well comparing the 40-150 and 35-100 is much like comparing an Merc C200 and an SLK500.
40-150 is in the hundreds whilst the other's price tag is in the thousands. The lens elements and construction, body are simply different. ![]() Well do agree that its not a cheap hobby. But when you think of other hobbies (such as golf, scuba diving, RC model cars or planes) they're expensive as well. Frankly its still rather affordable in some aspects if you limit yourself to the 45-150, 50, or even value for money Sigma range of 4/3 lens Last edited by raycsk; 28th October 2005 at 11:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: GagalandCloud9
Posts: 451
|
Get the younger brother 50-200mm, 1/3 of the price of 35-100mm.
Then again, u gotta know wat u need. Even photos taken with the kit lens is impressive. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: khatib
Posts: 123
|
hey,i am selling my olympus c-770 ultrazoom,its very new,with fullbox.and a tama 0.45 wide angle lens,interested msg to my email at billy_yuen86@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 385
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: khatib
Posts: 123
|
????????????
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|