Rolleiflex 2.8 F

[rebbot]

Hi guys,

My dad has recently cleared his cabinet and found a Rolleiflex 2.8 F which he bought in the 70's. He still has the leather casing and accessories when he bought new the last time. Its in extremely good condition. I would like to ask if anyone know the going price for this as I would like to bring it to TCW or Prime to sell if they accept it.

Cheers & TIA~

[elixir]

I think there are alot of models for the TLR.......I've seen the price ranging from 300 to more than 1k

[rebbot]

It kinda looks like this though:-

http://www.rolleiclub.com/rollei/tlr/038.htm

[nightwolf75]

oh man... wat a classic!! u shld keep it!!

there are many variations of this classic. can read more abt the review here.
http://www.photographyreview.com/cat...6_3107crx.aspx

[Allegro]

Originally Posted by rebbot Hi guys, My dad has recently cleared his cabinet and found a Rolleiflex 2.8 F which he bought in the 70's. He still has the leather casing and accessories when he bought new the last time. Its in extremely good condition. I would like to ask if anyone know the going price for this as I would like to bring it to TCW or Prime to sell if they accept it.

There are two types of Rolleiflex 2.8F, identifiable from the serial no., above nameplate:

Type 1 - 2,400,000 - 2,451,850 (ca 1960 - 1966)
Type 2 - 2,451,851 - ? (1966 - 1981)

Taking lens is 80mm f2.8, either Zeiss Planar or Schneider Xenotar (both great lenses, but the Zeiss Planar has higher reputation because of collectors' interest.)

The 2.8F was last priced around US$1000 in the late 70's. Its value today is largely dependent on it's condition (cosmetic, state of the viewing and taking lens, and whether it is still in full working order. Availability of other things like hood, filters, close-up filters, case and strap can also make a big difference in its value.)

A mint example of late 2.8F can still fetch well above S$1K (that "shop" at Adxphi would probably chop suckers at $1.5K to $2K...) but a "user" (slow speeds sticky, lens fugus, scratched are common problems) may not be worth much ($600-$800 if you are lucky.) That said, IMHO, neither Prime nor TCW would pay you cash for a 2.8F (unless at karang guni price. Don't!). They would probably tell you no demand for such old thing lah, everyone goes digital nowaday. why not u trade in or consign ... blah blah. (But don't take my words for it, try them out).

Then what? Open the back of the TLR, set the aperture to max (f2.8), set to B, press shutter and check the taking lens through a light source and see if the lens is fugus and scratch free. If so, it is worth sending it for a complete CLA (not cheap though. $200 - $300 est.) The 2.8F is still capable of producing images of superb quality. Some say it is as good if not better than a Hassy.

If I were you, I would just keep it, for shear sentimental reason. value? it's priceless )

allegro

[boopoo]

sorry for interupt the shop there are doing business put then in yr shoes there need to pay rent, make money to survice like we working for people right there need to pay cash for yr things is a gamer if no one buy that it,i do agree some shop are one kind but not all.... they r quit reasonable some cs member selling much more expensive than than ... that what i feel hope do not offence u ..... the last pieces i saw at the shop only selling at 1200 to 1300 . 1500 is the asking price.....

[Allegro]

Hate to OT, but take in at karang guni price and sell at "collector" price seems very much the order of the day for the 2nd hand shops here. All that I want to say is "Caveat Emptor - Buyer Beware "

[rebbot]

Thanks for all the advises guys~! Gosh this really suckz mebbe I should send it in for a check first and then sell on ebay

[rebbot]

Originally Posted by Allegro There are two types of Rolleiflex 2.8F, identifiable from the serial no., above nameplate: Type 1 - 2,400,000 - 2,451,850 (ca 1960 - 1966) Type 2 - 2,451,851 - ? (1966 - 1981) Taking lens is 80mm f2.8, either Zeiss Planar or Schneider Xenotar (both great lenses, but the Zeiss Planar has higher reputation because of collectors' interest.) The 2.8F was last priced around US$1000 in the late 70's. Its value today is largely dependent on it's condition (cosmetic, state of the viewing and taking lens, and whether it is still in full working order. Availability of other things like hood, filters, close-up filters, case and strap can also make a big difference in its value.) A mint example of late 2.8F can still fetch well above S$1K (that "shop" at Adxphi would probably chop suckers at $1.5K to $2K...) but a "user" (slow speeds sticky, lens fugus, scratched are common problems) may not be worth much ($600-$800 if you are lucky.) That said, IMHO, neither Prime nor TCW would pay you cash for a 2.8F (unless at karang guni price. Don't!). They would probably tell you no demand for such old thing lah, everyone goes digital nowaday. why not u trade in or consign ... blah blah. (But don't take my words for it, try them out). Then what? Open the back of the TLR, set the aperture to max (f2.8), set to B, press shutter and check the taking lens through a light source and see if the lens is fugus and scratch free. If so, it is worth sending it for a complete CLA (not cheap though. $200 - $300 est.) The 2.8F is still capable of producing images of superb quality. Some say it is as good if not better than a Hassy. If I were you, I would just keep it, for shear sentimental reason. value? it's priceless ) allegro

Mine is the one with the Zeiss Planar at least that's what it says on the label To be really frank, I would really love to keep it but feel that it would not see too much action. I will see how it goes nevertheless. Really appreciate it~

[Tetrode]

Originally Posted by rebbot Mine is the one with the Zeiss Planar at least that's what it says on the label To be really frank, I would really love to keep it but feel that it would not see too much action. I will see how it goes nevertheless. Really appreciate it~

What is the serial number of the camera and where is it located?

If it is located on the top where the Waist Level finder is, it is the earlier version or type 1. If the serial number is located around the taking lens, it is likely a late 'White face' model. White face examples generally start with in the 29XXXXXX number range with a few in the 24XXXXXXX range.

If it is a white face and in mint condition. Asking prices on Ebay is about $800-1.5K USD. Those with the original boxes and IBs can fetch $2KUSD. Those with Zeiss lenses are more highly prized by collectors. But both the Schneider Xenotar and CZ Planar are good. Some say that the Xenotar is better for colour photography than the Planar having better colour reproduction.

The earlier version that was made from the early 60s to the early/mid 70s may suffer from Balsaming - i.e. the organic Canadian balsam used to cement the lens elements together tend to disintegrate with age and cause blooming/rainbowing. Synthetic cement was used in the later models hence eliminating this issue.

I'd keep it if I were you. It's the Rolls Royce or Rolex of Cameras. Works of art and they don't make them like they used to. I'll never part with mine.