![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 70
|
Hi Guys,
Read about this baby yet in dpreview.com? Goodness gracious is offering a totally new revolution in the swirl-body of the Fseries. Could this be another new series away from the famous swirl-body Fseries? Apart from the 10mpixels that is catchy; below are some that i found pretty neat... 1) 24mm-120mm (much wider angle) 2) claim to have a better processor and less-power consumption 500shots/charge 3) Bigger LCD (2") 4) LCD can be kept(hide) after use. for much detail spec in the hardware, pls refer to http://www.dpreview.com/articles/sonydscr1/ ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by trueno; 8th September 2005 at 04:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 464
|
Wow! Real cool 10 MP! If this digicam can produce almost noiseless @ ISO 1600 than it's a prosumer killer! Sure must save up and buy!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
from side look nice, the back like sh.it.
anyway, no swivel lens = potential for failure...
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 149
|
Well, on paper.....
Likes: ISO 3200, mechanical lens focus ring, larger CCD-> better dynamic range?? Dislikes : f/4.8 at 120mm, no more 3D holographic AF |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 70
|
Hi guys,
From the prospect that Sony is having the 10mpixel sensor, for this new R type. I am quite convince that the Fseries(swirl body) can be going toward the 10mpixels region. the wider angle for the R1 attracted me, but does it really improve more? Big Sensor on this. Coolios, it look the same size of a DSLR. I wonder why Sony don't want to get into the DSLR side? Perhaps they are not ready to produce their own lens? but all along they colaborating with Carl Zeiss. Carl Zeiss Lens to expensive for the community. They are reserve to use 2" LCD instead of the trend now in 2.5". Why? Power consumption? i wonder again on how to the LCD swirl on top of the camera? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 453
|
if you look at the picture carefully, the LCD panel is actually built on top!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the heart of SengKang
Posts: 4,976
|
__________________
War is one of the most regrettable human activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
![]() after seeing this pic, i think i retract my previous post... hahaha... hmm maybe can really 'sell' my F828 to get this baby...
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
![]() This thing look solid... btw it kinda look like konica minolta A200, Z3, Z5... |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Singapore
Posts: 487
|
Just adding a few cents into this
It's a very, very interesting camera, with several implications. Will this be the beginning of a new trend? Are the chip yields for cmos sensors getting to the point where they will be common place in a prosumer class camera? If they are then it will be good times for budding digital photographers soon. Another thing would be the price point of this camera. Will it be launched at the f828 (1.6+k) price or will it be more expensive? The only down thing about this whole camera is the max aperture. I suspect it might be deliberate on the part of sony in some weird product differentiation that they want to achieve (room for improvement on future models?) It's strange that they reduced the zoom range but reduced the max aperture in the process, doesn't seem quite logical but I don't know lens designs so maybe there's some sort of compromise going on here If the max aperture was the same as the f828, sony would have a product beyond compare on paper. Hope that the picture quality lives up to the specs that we see. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
|
btw this only applicable to prosumer, dslr since the lens is interchangable, they need to calculate base on the 35mm film, unless its made for APS-C or other sensor.
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,719
|
everything looks ok except the LCD..weird location
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
I am seriously considering this camera. Just need to read more review on it. I am very interested to know how it performs in low light situations (noise). Anybody got any update on the noise issues? Please post here for all. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Astin Studio
Posts: 4,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,719
|
but T series looks super slim..thats quite normal isnt it?![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 464
|
From the side, it looks like a medium format camera like those Mamiya 645 type. But the price is on the high side, hopefully this cam can produce excellent images @ higher ISO setting. Not just @ ISO 100 or 200 or even 400.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok Reservoir
Posts: 880
|
I wonder if the average consumer will buy this since there is no movie mode.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok Reservoir
Posts: 880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5,451
|
__________________
the SEARCH FUNCTION is there for a reason. USE IT! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|