Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 70

Thread: Not obvious camera bag

  1. #1

    Default Not obvious camera bag

    Hi,

    Does anyone know if there are across-the-body sling type camera bags that doesn't look like camera bags at all? Reason is because I will be travelling overseas alone and I do not want others (especially muggers) to know that I have an expensive camera in the bag. Backpacks are out as they are relatively easy for pickpockets in crowded areas.

    To make things easier, I am not carrying any additional lenses. Just need a bag that can hold a camera, some spare batteries, wallet, passport and stuff.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Moderator nightwolf75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    really MORE diaper changes
    Posts
    17,867
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidFX
    Hi,

    Does anyone know if there are across-the-body sling type camera bags that doesn't look like camera bags at all? Reason is because I will be travelling overseas alone and I do not want others (especially muggers) to know that I have an expensive camera in the bag. Backpacks are out as they are relatively easy for pickpockets in crowded areas.

    To make things easier, I am not carrying any additional lenses. Just need a bag that can hold a camera, some spare batteries, wallet, passport and stuff.

    Thanks!
    u can try getting a domke (from CP at peninsular), safrotto or mekko (both available at TCW at peninsular hotel) canvas bags. once u remove the name tags, they are not dat much different from any canvas bags.
    If Life worked on auto mode then manual mode for photography would have never existed. ― Deeksha Mittal

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NTU and Wdls
    Posts
    2,622

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    haha domke bag.. 1 look will know le.. it's too distinctive..

  4. #4
    Moderator nightwolf75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    really MORE diaper changes
    Posts
    17,867
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Quote Originally Posted by unseen
    haha domke bag.. 1 look will know le.. it's too distinctive..
    any camera bag of any brand will be obvious to any photographer or other thieves anywhere in the world. our fren here wants to minimise the exposure of the bag. thus, the best way (IMO) is to get one of those canvas bags and remove the name tags. at the very least, it removes the most obvious sign dat it is a camera bag from a distance.
    If Life worked on auto mode then manual mode for photography would have never existed. ― Deeksha Mittal

  5. #5

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidFX
    Hi,

    Does anyone know if there are across-the-body sling type camera bags that doesn't look like camera bags at all? Reason is because I will be travelling overseas alone and I do not want others (especially muggers) to know that I have an expensive camera in the bag. Backpacks are out as they are relatively easy for pickpockets in crowded areas.

    To make things easier, I am not carrying any additional lenses. Just need a bag that can hold a camera, some spare batteries, wallet, passport and stuff.

    Thanks!
    Not recommended to put wallet, passport and cash in the bag. Passport, credit cards, cash etc are preferable put in money bag and belt to body. Cash can be slotted in shoes, belt etc.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    LV, Gucci, Prada...
    & a lot more.
    Take your pick..

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    SGee
    Posts
    1,572

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    how about a messenger bag?? it looks like a document bag, only bulkier- 2 acommodate an SLR. get a lesser known brand. not so heart pain wen ripping off d logo...

    i manage 2 fit-
    . an SLR
    . a wide angle zoom lense
    . external flash
    . a 500ml water bottle
    . table tripod
    in de main compartment.

    de $$ of such bag depends on d brand u r buying & where. it can range from $70-$250.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Potong Pasir
    Posts
    149

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Billingham bags. Very low profile. Costly, but worth the money

  9. #9
    Senior Member benny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    2,366

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Quote Originally Posted by sillyme
    Billingham bags. Very low profile. Costly, but worth the money
    I would agree with that.

    LiquidFX....the nick looks so familiar...

    Cheers,

  10. #10

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    crumpler? cos quite a number of crumpler sling bags are not camera bags.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    east
    Posts
    585

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Billingham? Not too discreet leh, unless it's the black or the olive green colour. Most photogs can recognize one from a distance...haha. What about a cheapo canvas bag and put the protective compartment inside? those from domke and billingham can be taken out and put in other bags...

  12. #12

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    SAF backpacks

    Ayah.. most photog can spot a cam bag in any guise. Anyway, unless you "bakzhang" your cam, you might be "targeted" the moment you take the cam out of your bag loh.

    You juz need a bag (mabbe a normal school bag) that dosen't look too flashy/bright coloured/new.
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Probably will be flame for suggesting this
    The best is the shopping/plastic bag
    头可断,血可流,倩女不可不追求 carpe diem,when in doubt, hoot first,apologise later:p GALLERY

  14. #14

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Wow, thanks guys, you are fast.

    I will explore your suggestions diligently. I tend towards crumpler messenger bags now as they look tough (un-snatchable) and waterproof. Bilingham bags look a bit too "classy"

    Benny, yeah, I am the same LiquidFX from the other forum. Wynx intro me here. I think I should know loupgarou as well.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Quote Originally Posted by eow
    Probably will be flame for suggesting this
    The best is the shopping/plastic bag
    LOL! I'll take your suggestion if you carry your camera and passport around in a NTUC shopping bag.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Clementi
    Posts
    2,550

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    eh no bag is goin to help once ur cam is out. if u r gona keep it in the bag all the time, might as well dont bring it there

    if the would be thief knows his domkes n billinghams, he will just steal the bag regardless of wats in the bag.
    Last edited by hazekang; 22nd August 2005 at 10:48 AM.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Dude

    where r u goin to, in the first place? I don't tink so even if u'r out on ur own, people wud wanna grab ur bag. Give the people ard the world a chance will ya. Guess it's abt being careful. U can carry the most market like plastic bag but if u'r dress with gold chain n bars i'm sure u'r an ez target.

    Btw how r u goin to shoot if ur camera is in the bag??

    My suggestion is don't worry too much abt attracting attention. U'r on holiday i presume, so have fun, shoot as much as u can and as u wan. Most of the other stuff, like bein rob, kidnap, pickpocket leave it to fate. Why worry abt things that is out of ur control. Of course dont pull too much attn to yourself.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    I use a bag to hold my camera and accessories.

    I do not use a bag to hide my camera. Do not be under the illusion that snatch thieves are idiots. They know what you have.

    The thing to do is to assume that thieves are out there. When in crowded places, sling the strap over your shoulder. Make sure you do not have things in your back pockets. If you have an overcoat or wind-cheater, make sure they are zipped up.

    Hold your camera in front with your hand on it all the time. You are going to take pictures right? What is it doing in the bag?

    And in today's digital technology, why do you need to have a bag anyway when you are out photographing. I keep the bag in the hotel. Keep one spare battery and CF card. (Actually I also carry one film camera with a few rolls of films in my pockets).

    Free and easy!

  19. #19

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    I am going to London and a couple of places around there, probably Scotland and maybe France. Actually, I feel the main danger would not be at the destinations where you are doing the shooting as they are usually the touristy areas which are fairly crowded, but rather, the danger would be during the process of travelling in the subways, train, dark alleys etc.

    Carrying an obvious camera bag around those areas will make you a fairly tempting target for muggers because a lone asian definitely looks out of place.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Not obvious camera bag

    Travelling in the London underground and French metro will not be more dangerous than the Singapore MRT.

    But one will be nuts to travel in such places at 12 midnight! Even without any cameras, I will hesistate to travel in such places at night, unless there are hordes of late night travellers. When travelling, why would you go to dark places?

    Use common sense.

    There are places when muggers will be around. In such places, such as the dark alleys (would you dare to walk in dark alleys in Singapore at 2.00 am?), whatever bags you carry will be irrelevant.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •