ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Before Digital, Beyond 35mm > Rangefinders and Compacts

Rangefinders and Compacts For the 35mm purists


 
Thread Tools
Old 27th July 2005   #1
laptoprob
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Haarlem
Posts: 12
Default FS Hexanon 90

A perfect like NIB Hexanon 90/2,8 lens. Fully compatible with the Leica M system.
Yours for US$500 plus shipping and paypal fee.
I can't find how to post pictures here so: pictures:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...&threadid=9228

thanks, Rob.
laptoprob is offline  
Old 29th July 2005   #2
thx1138
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19
Default

Konica Hexar RF has a different back focus point compared to Leica-M / VC Bessa bodies. Hence, the Konica made lenses may not focus accurately on Leica-M or VC bodies. Look at Erwin Putts articles for further details.
thx1138 is offline  
Old 29th July 2005   #3
laptoprob
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Haarlem
Posts: 12
Default

That is an already proven red herring, faflse story. Puts is a Leica-writer. Konica and Leica are fully compatible.
The different build of the Konica is because of the motor-transport.
Whatever, the lens is sold.
laptoprob is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 29th July 2005   #4
XXX Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
Posts: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by thx1138
Konica Hexar RF has a different back focus point compared to Leica-M / VC Bessa bodies. Hence, the Konica made lenses may not focus accurately on Leica-M or VC bodies. Look at Erwin Putts articles for further details.
You are right! Konica lens back focus is diff from Leica. You may get out of focus shots with a tele and more worse if shoot wide-open.
Who told you same??? Pls read more b4 comment!
XXX Boy is offline  
Old 29th July 2005   #5
Terence
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I'm a Llama!
Posts: 4,716
Default

Rob, no use arguing with these people.
Terence is offline  
Old 30th July 2005   #6
szekiat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
Default

hmm, i dunno about u guys but my 90 summi and my 40summi works beautifully on my new RF!!!!
szekiat is offline  
Old 31st July 2005   #7
Keltzar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West
Posts: 3,161
Default

FYI, Cathay Photo has 2 pieces of this 90mm lens... about S$800++ each new, if i recall.
Keltzar is offline  
Old 2nd August 2005   #8
laptoprob
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Haarlem
Posts: 12
Default Hexar!

Originally Posted by Terence
Rob, no use arguing with these people.
I know Terence, I know. Just can't resist making a valid point.
I found a very convincing story about all of this at Dante Stella's site.

Believe what you want!

Rob.
laptoprob is offline  
Old 2nd August 2005   #9
breakaway
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,121
Default

Quoted from Put's site
"If you were to do your own testing and looking at the negatives with an 8-times magnifier, you would not se any drop in resolution (beyond the detection capability of the eye at that magnification). But at a larger magnification you begin to see it quite clearly."

From 8 times magnification onwards then do you BEGIN to see difference.
breakaway is offline  
Old 2nd August 2005   #10
szekiat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
Default

err...my negs are often drum scanned or done on an imacon flextight at much higer magnifications. The plane of focus wide open is still where i want it to be. More often then not, it is because of my poor focussing.
szekiat is offline  
Old 2nd August 2005   #11
szekiat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
Default

Btw, puts is a leica man who knows next to zilt beyond his beloved leicas. No offense meant to fondlers but puts is hardly what i'd call an authority on RF designs.
szekiat is offline  
Old 3rd August 2005   #12
XXX Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
Posts: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by breakaway
Quoted from Put's site
"If you were to do your own testing and looking at the negatives with an 8-times magnifier, you would not se any drop in resolution (beyond the detection capability of the eye at that magnification). But at a larger magnification you begin to see it quite clearly."

From 8 times magnification onwards then do you BEGIN to see difference.
So there is still a problem lo...Seriously I would not spent so much on this Konica optics, rather to get a used Leica one.
Just my 2 cents.
XXX Boy is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.08843 seconds with 7 queries