11th July 2005, 02:08 PM
12th July 2005, 08:52 PM
the reason that singapore is too small to support photo magazines is not really credible since photoI, lightbox, asian photography are still around. if the market is small, what are the rest doing?
16th July 2005, 10:54 PM
17th July 2005, 08:50 PM
Grain tried to be different. They didn't gave out photography tips or much gear review. But I like it nonetheless. They tend to write more about the culture of photography and feature local talents.
Originally Posted by star69
Last edited by Ben1223; 17th July 2005 at 08:54 PM.
17th July 2005, 11:06 PM
i thought that the recent grain issues were better, but still i roughly agree with my earlier evaluation: not enough real substance. they did do gear reviews, but no real work there. nothing compared to Amateur Photographer's. their more 'arty-farty' pieces didn't give enough real insight into photography IMO.
my local fave is photo-i. all-round fave is AP
6th September 2005, 09:47 AM
Re: GRAIN is dead
I agreed. I bought the first copy, and read a few from the library and IMHO the content really not up to standard compared to those from Europe or America. Some photos used really sucks and or low standard.
Originally Posted by EiRiK