![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 192
|
IF it is interchangeable lenses system, just wondering what lenes the new DSLR will be using. Can the discontinued Olympus OM Lenses be used on this camera?
Or perhaps OLY is coming out with a new range of lenses for this new DSLR? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bedok
Posts: 1,538
|
Or.... use Canon Mount... hehehhehe
__________________
Canon Lover :) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: L2TPYSG
Posts: 4,514
|
no longer 35mm but smaller... so new lenses.
MF maybe can taped on using velcro hehe klause I think once oly makes it 3rd party's will flow in..
__________________
"I'm... dreaming... of a wide... angle~ Just like the ones I used to know~" |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: East
Posts: 2,149
|
I'm wondering, if this four thirds size is fixed, and new lenses are built for this size, then how are they going to increase pixel count? I mean, don't tell me they are going to pack future 12mp into the same size CCD? That will mean resolution and noise problem....
if they do increase sensor size, then the lens system will have to change too.... anyone has any insights to this? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: L2TPYSG
Posts: 4,514
|
insights? or insider info? hehe
insights huh, umm current info says 35mm is too big for CCD+CMOS cos the light angle is not direct enough... one of them is slightly better but still got CA-ish probs... and vignette style light falloff... the 4/3 hence has a smaller area and the light cone needed is narrower -> better distribution of light... I personally think 4/3s is meant to be a consumer class SLR series... using those CCDs like now... currently a 5mp ccd is slightly smaller? maybe kodak will water down and dump their 760 ccds here... and the mp will limit at "good enough for newbie" size... why I think so? becos oly is WAY behind in SLR pro technology (ie non-existent) and they do have the very ergonomic IS-3/4/500 cams (very NICE to use like digicam) so they will use this to try and corner the eos300 and F55/66/77 etc kind of market... which they couldn't becos the IS series cannot buy lenses, except for those TCs and WCs... so gadget geeks like us wun buy it cos might as well buy SLR... so now they have a fresh start becos no one has a consumer-class DSLR yet... pro-wise kodak is nothing except for their imager tech... always the pro AF/AE etc are from the cam coy like nikon f5 or eos 1v... whew.. essay siah... like my marketing presentation? LOL
__________________
"I'm... dreaming... of a wide... angle~ Just like the ones I used to know~" |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: L2TPYSG
Posts: 4,514
|
and if u wanna buy olydak, buy the 2nd model haha
1st model -> buggy 2nd model -> bugfix + new tech 3rd model -> production optimization (cheaper parts yux) having got 2 oly uzis (1 original 1 gtee replacement) the first one is better... dunno why... 2nd one had dead pixels which I exchanged for a 3rd one which had an LCD scratch ON THE INSIDE... hard to see but vs the 1st one... sigh...
__________________
"I'm... dreaming... of a wide... angle~ Just like the ones I used to know~" |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,492
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|