![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
i used to have a 41-37 thread size converter but becos the thread is too small i can only take a decent photo (w/o the hole) when i zoom in totally... that's why its either i use 3x zoom or i max to 6 x... i can't take a photo within 4x and 5x zoom.
can someone tell me that is the correct thread size to prevent this from happening? Anyway i'll be getting my c4000 today so it should be 41-? |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 332
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
Like what PsychoBoy stated, the best option by far is to simply use the Olympus lens adaptor designed specifically for their Camedia digicams (except the C-7xx "ultra zooms"). It's called the CLA-1 ("Camedia Lens Adaptor"), and it has 43mm front threads.
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
prob is even if i buy the CLA-10 my tc also cannot be used... the thread for my dc is onli 37 and i ask Ap ppl and they also say i have to suck thumb and live with it.
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: @ Singapore Marine Parade
Posts: 1,543
|
i'm also havign problems with getting a good Tc.... so now i'm just waiting for the cash to get a Olympus Tc.....
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Guests
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: @ Singapore Marine Parade
Posts: 1,543
|
how abouth the 210?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AMK, Singapore
Posts: 610
|
I found that the following article (taken from elsewhere in this forum) gives good insight into suitable armouring..
http://www.cliffshade.com/dpfwiw/c-2...ters/index.htm So I've ended up buying the following items for my C3020.. total $58.. din really bargain.. ![]() - CLA-1 ($32) - 43-46mm step-up ring ($8) - 46mm Vitacon UV filter ($12) - 46mm lens cap ($6) Last edited by stk; 29th September 2002 at 01:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: @ Singapore Marine Parade
Posts: 1,543
|
about just a little of the corner... but it is quite obvious at full wide... i'm running on a CLA-1 and a step up ring and a UV filter and it is arleady blocking the flash....
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AMK, Singapore
Posts: 610
|
Even the CLA-1 alone would block part of the viewfinder and flash (at wide angle) liao.. so going with a 43mm extension won't totally solve the problem and u run the risk of still ending up with slight vignetting at full 32mm wide angle (won't know till u try). That's why i decided to go with 46mm as a balanced choice.. Even though 49mm filters are more widely available, 49mm would block the flash even more liao..
![]() Guess that's the trade off of armouring and using filters.. Last edited by stk; 29th September 2002 at 07:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: @ Singapore Marine Parade
Posts: 1,543
|
so it's time to get external flashes
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AMK, Singapore
Posts: 610
|
Luckily i'm more into outdoor and scenery photography.. not so much on flash or indoor photography.. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: @ Singapore Marine Parade
Posts: 1,543
|
![]() just wondering how much is a Olympus C-210 Tele lense? Last edited by SianZronG; 30th September 2002 at 07:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AMK, Singapore
Posts: 610
|
I know the C-210 has longer 1.9x zoom as compared to the TCON-14's 1.45x.. but also read the C-210 quality not as good as the TCON-14.. and has vignetting even at full telephoto.. Can share experience? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|