ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Nikon

Nikon At the heart of the image


 
Thread Tools
Old 19th June 2005   #1
Joel Lyn
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bishan
Posts: 95
Smile Nikon FG- 20 compatible lenses

Can anyone reccomand 1 or 2 carry- around lenses for nikon fg- 20 ?
Joel Lyn is offline  
Old 19th June 2005   #2
zmwang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Air-Con country
Posts: 2,459
Default

28-85/3.5-4.5 AIS lens.
zmwang is offline  
Old 20th June 2005   #3
litefoot
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by Joel Lyn
Can anyone reccomand 1 or 2 carry- around lenses for nikon fg- 20 ?
The Nikkor 24-120 used to be a good walk around. However, it has been replaced by a G version with VR which does not come with the aperture ring therefore not suitable for your camera. You may want to try the 28-105.

AIS lenses cost more, not value for money. Unless you want to get it used.
litefoot is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 20th June 2005   #4
zmwang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Air-Con country
Posts: 2,459
Default

28-105 is AF lens wo, I think FG-20 is MF camera.
zmwang is offline  
Old 22nd June 2005   #5
litefoot
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by zmwang
28-105 is AF lens wo, I think FG-20 is MF camera.
Yes, its AF and usable on MF. I believe there isn't any G replacement for this lens, so its still has the aperture ring which MF body required.
litefoot is offline  
Old 22nd June 2005   #6
zmwang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Air-Con country
Posts: 2,459
Default

Originally Posted by litefoot
Yes, its AF and usable on MF. I believe there isn't any G replacement for this lens, so its still has the aperture ring which MF body required.
But the “手感” not good, for AF lens.
zmwang is offline  
Old 22nd June 2005   #7
Joel Lyn
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bishan
Posts: 95
Default ok...

so i would say which one is good ??
Joel Lyn is offline  
Old 24th June 2005   #8
litefoot
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by zmwang
But the “手感” not good, for AF lens.
Agreed, not the "geary" feel but rather turning the ring like gliding through... er.. butter?
litefoot is offline  
Old 24th June 2005   #9
litefoot
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by Joel Lyn
so i would say which one is good ??
He is just talking about "feel". To me its just secondary. I still suggest the 28-105.
litefoot is offline  
Old 24th June 2005   #10
jamestan
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,660
Default

28-105
35-105
35-135...

I have used them all and am still holding on to the 35-105. For wide angle shots, have a 24mm. I use the FTn, FM2 as my manual cameras.
jamestan is offline  
Old 24th June 2005   #11
Joel Lyn
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bishan
Posts: 95
Default ...

fm- 2 is the more popular camera for manual. but i have a fg- 20 on habd so no point in getting a new one....
Joel Lyn is offline  
Old 24th June 2005   #12
Joel Lyn
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bishan
Posts: 95
Default thanks...

thanks anw.... thank you all for ur advice... so tat i don need to scratch my head...
Joel Lyn is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.08173 seconds with 7 queries