ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Photo Galleries > Reportage and Sports

Reportage and Sports Photojournalistic, Reportage, Events Coverage, Sports Illustrated.


 
Thread Tools
Old 17th June 2005   #1
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default S-League--Warrior vs Young Lion

**Picture removed as it is not worth to be shown in Clubsnap as advise by JED**

Now u saved it...


**Picture removed as it is not worth to be shown in Clubsnap as advise by JED**

Now u don't...

**Picture removed as it is not worth to be shown in Clubsnap as advise by JED**


Great save???
__________________
JRimageXpress.com

Last edited by John Tan; 17th June 2005 at 11:04 PM.
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #2
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

can't understand what you are writing about. so was it a successful save, or not?
sehsuan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #3
Jed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,081
Default

John, you REALLY need to sort those horizons out, whether in camera or in PS. Or in this case, not the horizon but the goalposts. In the first two it's leaning one way, in the third (which is the weakest of the three - the other two are much better) it's leaning the other way.
Jed is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 17th June 2005   #4
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

Originally Posted by sehsuan
can't understand what you are writing about. so was it a successful save, or not?
ok in simple English - yes it a successful save for the last pic only.
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #5
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

Originally Posted by Jed
John, you REALLY need to sort those horizons out, whether in camera or in PS. Or in this case, not the horizon but the goalposts. In the first two it's leaning one way, in the third (which is the weakest of the three - the other two are much better) it's leaning the other way.
wow your eyes are so sharp...
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #6
Jed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,081
Default

It's not sharp eyes, it's just I find it sticks out very obviously. Goalposts stand perpendicular to the ground so it looks funny if they're at an angle. Like I said in your previous thread, it's no MAJOR problem - just make sure you sort it out in PS first.
Jed is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #7
matrix1195
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 192
Default Saf vs Young Lions

Keep practising....

Last edited by megaweb; 20th June 2005 at 02:10 PM.
matrix1195 is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #8
billpepsi
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The 3rd Rock
Posts: 1,272
Default

pic 1

Same here, I didn't notice the tilted goalpost (pic 2) until Jed pointed it out.
billpepsi is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #9
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

if the images are the full images resized down, i suggest cropping tight for the first shot - that seems to show some peak action and reaction from the keeper. the other two, well, save them inside your computer.
sehsuan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #10
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

Originally Posted by jeffhiew
pic 1

Same here, I didn't notice the tilted goalpost (pic 2) until Jed pointed it out.
This is my bad habit...to get tilted pic...especially in fast action shooting ...unless I use it for competition/selling/gallery/...I don't see the need to spend time to correct my pic...as I had mentioned before, I have a lot of (paid) backlog photos that need to be clear...
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #11
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

Originally Posted by sehsuan
if the images are the full images resized down, i suggest cropping tight for the first shot - that seems to show some peak action and reaction from the keeper. the other two, well, save them inside your computer.
Wow your standard r so high...I know that the 3rd one is nothing great especially can't see his face but I just want to show others only...btw I got 2 chances to take 3 continuous shots photos on the goalkeeper only...
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #12
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

why show a photo, that doesn't help to convey how the match progressed? to some people, they would wonder what a single goalkeeper would be doing jumping and catching a ball at night. at least, include one or two of the attackers, that would bring back a sense of logic to your photos.
sehsuan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #13
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

ok u do got a pt. Thanks for the tips.
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #14
billpepsi
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The 3rd Rock
Posts: 1,272
Default

Originally Posted by sehsuan
why show a photo, that doesn't help to convey how the match progressed? to some people, they would wonder what a single goalkeeper would be doing jumping and catching a ball at night. at least, include one or two of the attackers, that would bring back a sense of logic to your photos.

It is nice to read yours and JED’s comment, though down right blunt and honest, I can see your point. The other day someone also pointed out that, keep the good pictures and trash the bad ones away, b’cos your best shots are just as good as those lousy photos on display.
billpepsi is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #15
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

jeffhiew, you would do better with Jed's advice - he's the working sports photo professional, i'm not
sehsuan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #16
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

U mean Jed work for SPH?
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #17
sehsuan
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,674
Default

Originally Posted by John Tan
U mean Jed work for SPH?
no. he's based in UK doing full time sports photography.
sehsuan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #18
billpepsi
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The 3rd Rock
Posts: 1,272
Default

Originally Posted by sehsuan
no. he's based in UK doing full time sports photography.

JED, show us some real stuff, can't wait to see your photos...
billpepsi is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #19
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

Originally Posted by Jed
It's not sharp eyes, it's just I find it sticks out very obviously. Goalposts stand perpendicular to the ground so it looks funny if they're at an angle. Like I said in your previous thread, it's no MAJOR problem - just make sure you sort it out in PS first.
Thanks for your guidance.
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Old 17th June 2005   #20
John Tan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JRimage Xpress
Posts: 5,682
Default

Originally Posted by sehsuan
no. he's based in UK doing full time sports photography.
Oh...I see. Thanks for your info.
__________________
JRimageXpress.com
John Tan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.11810 seconds with 7 queries