Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

  1. #1
    Member Mythmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Buangkok MRT
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Anyone tried before?

    1) Mounting a Raynox DCR250 directly
    2) Reverse mount a 50 1.8 in front of the lens

    Which would be better in terms of working distance, maximum magnification and image quality?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythmaker View Post
    Anyone tried before?

    1) Mounting a Raynox DCR250 directly
    2) Reverse mount a 50 1.8 in front of the lens

    Which would be better in terms of working distance, maximum magnification and image quality?
    Quite heavily discussed in the MACRO section. I suggest reading the stickies there where this is covered extensively. Plus the existing 50+ threads on this.
    Alpha

  3. #3
    Moderator rhino123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NA
    Posts
    5,247

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythmaker View Post
    Anyone tried before?

    1) Mounting a Raynox DCR250 directly
    2) Reverse mount a 50 1.8 in front of the lens

    Which would be better in terms of working distance, maximum magnification and image quality?
    Tried both. I like the Raynox DCR250 better.
    I am not a photographer, just someone who happened to have a couple of cameras.
    My lousy shots

  4. #4
    Member Mythmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Buangkok MRT
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rashkae View Post
    Quite heavily discussed in the MACRO section. I suggest reading the stickies there where this is covered extensively. Plus the existing 50+ threads on this.
    Existing 50+ threads? From which forum? As far as I can see, there's no macro discussion forum here, only a gallery.

    Or are you referring to this singular thread?

    http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showt...=255554&page=7

    There is *no* mention of my question, or much info on coupling rings.

    Quote Originally Posted by rhino123 View Post
    Tried both. I like the Raynox DCR250 better.
    Thanks for the more constructive answer

    May I know why?

  5. #5

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythmaker View Post
    Anyone tried before?

    1) Mounting a Raynox DCR250 directly
    2) Reverse mount a 50 1.8 in front of the lens

    Which would be better in terms of working distance, maximum magnification and image quality?
    It all depends on what you have as the main lens.
    Its more flexible if its a zoom since you can then vary magnification by changing the focal length on the lens.
    With a long prime as the main lens, usually the quality is a bit better. (but little variability to the magnification)

    The Raynox will be easier to put on and off because its clip on.
    For the same FL main lens, the Raynox should give more magnification too.

    In the end for me, I find that they both work on the same principle of closing up the minimum focus distance via a 'close up lens' so it just boils down to what you already have (eg. already have a cheap 50/1.8 to try) and want to spend.

  6. #6
    Member Mythmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Buangkok MRT
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by pinholecam View Post
    It all depends on what you have as the main lens.
    Its more flexible if its a zoom since you can then vary magnification by changing the focal length on the lens.
    With a long prime as the main lens, usually the quality is a bit better. (but little variability to the magnification)

    The Raynox will be easier to put on and off because its clip on.
    For the same FL main lens, the Raynox should give more magnification too.

    In the end for me, I find that they both work on the same principle of closing up the minimum focus distance via a 'close up lens' so it just boils down to what you already have (eg. already have a cheap 50/1.8 to try) and want to spend.
    Thanks for the info!

    So if it's the same main lens, the raynox would give better IQ eh. Noted haha. I do have a raynox. I also have a coupling ring. I have sold my macro lens long ago though, decided it's not really worth it to keep. Thinking whether a Canon 50 f1.4 + raynox would be better or a 50 f1.4 + 50 f1.8 would be better lol. If the latter is better I would go ahead and buy a 50 1.8, but since you mention it's not as good, I guess I'll just stick with a raynox then

  7. #7
    Member Bukitimah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,261

    Default

    My combination is 50 f1.8 plus Raynox 250. I am happy with this as I am not into magnifying subject too much. Flash is important in my opinion of you are into macro.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythmaker View Post
    Thanks for the info!

    So if it's the same main lens, the raynox would give better IQ eh. Noted haha. I do have a raynox. I also have a coupling ring. I have sold my macro lens long ago though, decided it's not really worth it to keep. Thinking whether a Canon 50 f1.4 + raynox would be better or a 50 f1.4 + 50 f1.8 would be better lol. If the latter is better I would go ahead and buy a 50 1.8, but since you mention it's not as good, I guess I'll just stick with a raynox then
    Raynox just gives a higher magnification.
    IQ between the 2 options is about the same.

    As Bukittimah said, lighting is more important

  9. #9
    Moderator rhino123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NA
    Posts
    5,247

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythmaker View Post
    Existing 50+ threads? From which forum? As far as I can see, there's no macro discussion forum here, only a gallery.

    Or are you referring to this singular thread?

    http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showt...=255554&page=7

    There is *no* mention of my question, or much info on coupling rings.



    Thanks for the more constructive answer

    May I know why?
    Note that I am not too much into macro. But I did a couple of macro shots once... with both Raynox and reversing of 50mm lens.

    The Raynox is easier to use as compared to the 50mm lens in my opinion.

    My set up with the reverse 50mm lens on a 100mm macro lens.








    A shot with Raynox 250 on my 100mm macro,




    The usual disclaimer, I am not expert in this field, the above is the best I could do.

    (I am not a photographer, just somebody who happened to have a few cameras).
    Last edited by rhino123; 25th October 2013 at 05:09 PM.
    I am not a photographer, just someone who happened to have a couple of cameras.
    My lousy shots

  10. #10
    Member Mythmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Buangkok MRT
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Thank you for the images, they helped alot I guess I'll go with the Raynox instead of the coupling ring then.

    A person who happened to have a few cameras won't put in so much effort in such stuff haha.

  11. #11
    Senior Member shierwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    3,334

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythmaker View Post
    Thanks for the info!

    So if it's the same main lens, the raynox would give better IQ eh. Noted haha. I do have a raynox. I also have a coupling ring. I have sold my macro lens long ago though, decided it's not really worth it to keep. Thinking whether a Canon 50 f1.4 + raynox would be better or a 50 f1.4 + 50 f1.8 would be better lol. If the latter is better I would go ahead and buy a 50 1.8, but since you mention it's not as good, I guess I'll just stick with a raynox then
    If you use 50mm lens with 50mm lens reverse mount, you get 50/50 = 1x magnification only.
    If you use 200mm lens to body and 50mm lens reverse mount to the 200mm, you get 200/50 = 4x magnification
    and so on....

    Direct reverse lens onto the body requires different calculation for magnification achieved

  12. #12
    Member Mythmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Buangkok MRT
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by shierwin View Post
    If you use 50mm lens with 50mm lens reverse mount, you get 50/50 = 1x magnification only.
    If you use 200mm lens to body and 50mm lens reverse mount to the 200mm, you get 200/50 = 4x magnification
    and so on....

    Direct reverse lens onto the body requires different calculation for magnification achieved
    Wow, didn't know this formula exists. Any idea on the working distance? No point having 4x MM when working distance is 1cm? haha.

  13. #13
    Senior Member shierwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    3,334

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythmaker View Post
    Wow, didn't know this formula exists. Any idea on the working distance? No point having 4x MM when working distance is 1cm? haha.
    Depends on the lenses mounted. Can try them out. Working distance will definitely be very small
    Last edited by shierwin; 28th October 2013 at 08:53 PM.

  14. #14
    Moderator rhino123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NA
    Posts
    5,247

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    Actually with very high magnification, I would suggest using a tripod and delay shoot. This is because, a slight shake will be magnified and your photo will become blur.
    I am not a photographer, just someone who happened to have a couple of cameras.
    My lousy shots

  15. #15
    Moderator daredevil123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    lil red dot
    Posts
    21,627
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Do you mind sharing what you intend to shoot? Without that info all suggestions are just shots in the wind.

  16. #16
    Member Mythmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Buangkok MRT
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Re: Raynox 250 or 50mm f1.8?

    My target is Shikhei Goh's level. Or biker11 from 500px. Both of which requires magnification of way more than 1:1.

    Getting a MPE-65 would be alot easier, just currently trying to see if there's other way of doing things (hence exploring raynox vs coupling rings). Or as a backup by using 70-200 f4 IS and raynox/coupling ring for some unplanned macro (in case I ever get a MPE-65, I can't possibly bring it everywhere I go lol).
    Last edited by Mythmaker; 29th October 2013 at 10:11 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •