Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: ND (Neutral Density) filter

  1. #1

    Default ND (Neutral Density) filter

    ND = Neutral Density

    here are 3 similar shots taken by using my Pro 90 IS at Botanic Gardens.

    Waterfall shot 1 (no filter used)
    Shutter speed: 1/320 sec
    Aperture: 2.8



    Waterfall shot 2 (no filter used)
    Shutter speed: 1/40 sec
    Aperture: 8.0


    Waterfall shot 3 (ND 8 and Polariser filters used)
    Shutter speed: 0.8 sec
    Aperture: 8.0


    As you can see , by adding a ND and polariser , I can set longer exposure to shutter speed to give a smooth effect on the waterfall ...
    See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    12,938

    Default

    Would -2.0EV, F8 and 0.8s shutter speed achieve a similar effect? Just wondering....
    Check out my wildlife pics at www.instagram.com/conrad_nature

  3. #3

    Default

    Originally posted by mpenza
    Would -2.0EV, F8 and 0.8s shutter speed achieve a similar effect? Just wondering....
    dunno leh .... will try out the settings next time ..
    See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    740

    Default

    the bottom curve at of the pic is kinda distracting imho

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    L2TPYSG
    Posts
    4,057

    Default

    without ND is not enough...
    "I'm... dreaming... of a wide... angle~
    Just like the ones I used to know~"

  6. #6

    Default

    Originally posted by mpenza
    Would -2.0EV, F8 and 0.8s shutter speed achieve a similar effect? Just wondering....
    I don't think so...when you do a -2.0EV, the cam will take with an actual exposure different from the F8 and 0.8s that you set, and you won't get the 0.8s blurring of the water. That's how I understand about exposure compensation, maybe I'm wrong.

  7. #7

    Default

    How abt a polarising filter? Will it be enough?

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by Tweek


    I don't think so...when you do a -2.0EV, the cam will take with an actual exposure different from the F8 and 0.8s that you set, and you won't get the 0.8s blurring of the water. That's how I understand about exposure compensation, maybe I'm wrong.
    Right. In fact, if you have an indicated exposure of say 1/2s at f/2.8, setting the exposure compensation to -2, you will either get 1/8s at f/2.8 or 1/2s at f8 (depending on the mode), and this will be shown on the LCD status display.

    Regards
    CK

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    12,938

    Default

    Originally posted by ckiang


    Right. In fact, if you have an indicated exposure of say 1/2s at f/2.8, setting the exposure compensation to -2, you will either get 1/8s at f/2.8 or 1/2s at f8 (depending on the mode), and this will be shown on the LCD status display.

    Regards
    CK
    hmm... thanks for the info. I was wondering how it works actually.

    changing EV setting under shutter priority mode, would I get intermediate values of Aperture (other than the F3.2, F4.8 and F8 on my camera)?
    Check out my wildlife pics at www.instagram.com/conrad_nature

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    6,405

    Default

    Originally posted by mpenza


    hmm... thanks for the info. I was wondering how it works actually.

    changing EV setting under shutter priority mode, would I get intermediate values of Aperture (other than the F3.2, F4.8 and F8 on my camera)?
    Not too sure, but don't think so. Most consumer digital cameras only have a fixed set of apertures. So the camera might 'cheat' by changing ISO or something.

    Regards
    CK

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Bukit Batok West Avenue 2
    Posts
    1,734

    Default

    Originally posted by Paladin
    How abt a polarising filter? Will it be enough?
    Polarising filters reduces only 1 to 2 stops, you may not be able to get a shutter speed that is long enough.

    As for EV compensation. On my camera, it adjust the light meter. If I use a +1EV, the camera will set the settings at 1 stop above what the meter read. So I guess reducing the EV will not work. Why not just crank the Aperture to the tiniest in aperture piority and see what is the longest posible shutter speed you can use... If this does not surfice (such as in the afternoon sun), pop in a ND to slow down the shutter. This is how I do it. And also when I want to use a specific aperture and shutter speed and if this over expose my shot, a ND will help.

    But well, I have more problems in regard with insufficient light and flash technique.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Pasir Ris
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Took this pic with a polariser w/o ND filter. Guess ND is indeed needed to take such pic.

    f/7
    shutter 1/5sec



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •