![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Area51
Posts: 309
|
Guys n Gals...
Have done a search on this key word ---> ROKKOR, but found no matches so far in CS... I'm wondering whethe there is / are some owner(s) of this type of Minolta old lense out there... I found a pretty impressive collector's website with allthe reviews as well... to share with u guys... http://www.rokkorfiles.com |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,538
|
got some ROKKORs
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Area51
Posts: 309
|
Mind to share with us? Which Minolta syst. are u using btw? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,538
|
-7-
just a pancake 45mm f2 Rokkor 50mm f1.7 Rokkor (a few) 35mm f1.8 Rokkor 28mm f2.8 Rokkor I think got Rokkor zoom lenses - deep inside dry cabi - so never look. also the Rokkors on my 7SII rangefinders. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Area51
Posts: 309
|
just curious why do u have more than 1 Tokkor 50mm f1.7? And one stupid quest.... is Rokkor compatibles to minolta newer body like Dynax series (Dyn5, 7, 9, etc...)? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
|
Minolta MC W.Rokkor-SG 28/3.5 Minolta MC W.Rokkor 28/3.5 Minolta Auto W.Rokkor-HG 35/2.8 Minolta MD 50/2 Minolta Auto Rokkor-PF 55/2 Minolta Auto Rokkor-PF 58/1.4 Minolta Auto Tele Rokkor-PF 135/2.8 Minolta MD Zoom 35-105/3.5-4.5 Well, to be fair, the two MD lenses aren't marked Rokkor, but being Minolta SR mount lenses, they should be! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Batok West Avenue 2
Posts: 1,739
|
You know, I'm actually looking for a rokkor 50mm for my X700... (which is lens-less at the moment)
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,538
|
-7-
Just itchy hand, buy 50mm quite cheap. Std lens is cheap and good. Light and bright. After a while when you have satisfied the want to own long lenses, unless you shoot birds or racing cars, normally you stop at 300mm. Then after a while you appreciate the cheap but good std lens. My MD lenses are manual focus and will not fit the autofocus Dynax. Simplicity is a good thing. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,904
|
Yeah, get a normal lens first, there are many for sale at the Peninsula area shops.......
I use an SR-1, XE, XM-Motor, getting an XDs soon......lenses: 21mm/2.8, 24mm/2.8 VFC, 58mm/1.2, 85mm/1.7, 200mm/2.8, some (three) macrobellows lenses and the bellows itself (bought from a good friend), looking for an MC 35mm/1.8 and a black SRT-303, and maybe a black SR-1, saw a few in Tokyo when I was there. Nice link! I didn't know about it! HS |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Area51
Posts: 309
|
Guys,
Thanks for the input... Ricohflex, Such a waste that the newer technology auto focus SLR body is not compatible with these excellent Rokkors... or is there any adapter that is able to make this possible? hongsien, wow... u have got a seriuos WA prime man... btw, how is the ranking of the bodies that u mentioned ---> SRT, SR, etc... from the website, SRT has 100 series, 200 series & 300 series... there are only 100series that can be found in KEH store. Cheers... |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 147
|
Minolta makes perhaps the best mirror lenses.
The 250mm F5.6 mirror is perhaps the finest mirror lens made. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,904
|
HS |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,538
|
hongsien I was looking for an XMmotor but cannot find. Heard there was an XK too. You got the fancy VFC lens. Can control the plane of focus. nice set of lenses. the older SRT series had metering called CLC which was contrast light compensation, an early attempt to auto adjust meter reading when subject is against high backlight. SRT-101 was popular in Singapore. Last edited by ricohflex; 9th April 2005 at 12:57 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,538
|
-7-
Someone told me he bought Seagull SLR and it was Minolta mount camera made under license. The std lens he bought was also Seagull but MD mount and he said very sharp. Not sure if it is true. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Area51
Posts: 309
|
thanks for the sharing... Is Seagull MD lense = manual focus lense? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,538
|
-7-
Yes they are manual focus MD mount lenses made in China. Got solid metal feel. I think no plastic. Heavy glass. |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,904
|
I don't quite like the fact that you must press the button on the grip in order to activate the auto exposure. If you don't press the button (on the XK/XM/X-1: the 'touch' strip), the camera will fire at one speed I think, NOT at the speed it is supposed to when the metering is activated! HS |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Teban Gardens
Posts: 2,610
|
Anyone out there using a Minolta X570?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,538
|
hongsien
Very interesting. I think the designer's concept was this: The XM is a professional grade camera. Being targeted at Pros, they will always leave it to the user to decide the exposure. That is the DEFAULT mode where the XM user decides the exposure setting and not the camera. However, if the user wishes to let the camera decide the auto exposure, then he consciously presses a button on the grip to allow this. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|