(Well, firstly forgive my ignorance)
Mmm, hope i did not step on anyone's toe.
But I notice Gimp has curves, levels, blur, ...
i.e. the essential components in pixel editing are there in Gimp.
Why do home users prefer/need to fork out the exhorbitant
amount for PS? (or risk / fear the BSA on using pirated copies?)
Is it because of
1) better implementation?
2) industry standard?
3) filters galleries? features....
Just curious. pls share leh....
Or should i phrase it this way:
what do u miss if u goto Gimp?