![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
I am trying to look for a portriat lens...just wondering which one is best around?
let me start for a few before i decide if i should change lens? Minotla : AF 85mm f1.4 --- highly effective for portraits with focus hold button. CIR aperture with floating system that give deforcused images.. Minolta : AF 100mm f2.8 SOFT FOCUS --- unique lens that provides a soft surrounding effect. got three settings to choose from. CIR aperture with focus lock on button too. Minolta : 135mm f2.8[T4.5] --- It has a apodization filter build in which achieve a natural shift from focused to defocused areas. The images taken are visually outstanding..Its in MANUAL FOCUS only...too bad.. Minolta : 135mm f2.8 --- Its a old lens, with no focus hold button. It is AF which makes life easier for portriats, fast and small too.. Minolta : 200mm f2.8 APO G --- Mid telephoto with focus lock button..Great pics but need to stand a little bit far away to take portriats... Minolta : 100mm f2.8 MAcro ( D ) --- Good range distance lens for portriats, with focus hold button. Its slow as it is a Marco lens. Minolta : 70-200mm (D) SSM --- How wrong can tis lens go? I think it was made for portriats . with 3 focus hold buttons but very expensive!
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 702
|
if you are ok with manual focus
how about a JUPITER 9 85mm f2.0 M42 mount ? not too sharp, not too soft cheap enough from EBA |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 136
|
Minotla : AF 85mm f1.4 --- highly effective for portraits with focus hold button.
CIR aperture with floating system that give deforcused images.. Minolta : AF 100mm f2.8 SOFT FOCUS --- unique lens that provides a soft surrounding effect. got three settings to choose from. CIR aperture with focus lock on button too. Minolta : 135mm f2.8[T4.5] --- It has a apodization filter build in which achieve a natural shift from focused to defocused areas. The images taken are visually outstanding..Its in MANUAL FOCUS only...too bad.. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- these three lenses sound interesting ! same as nikon defocus lenses ? cost ? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West, Singapore
Posts: 887
|
A good descriptiion given by Geno for each individual lens. Ultimately, it is the dollars and cents that matters. Another issue about using 200mm lens for portrait needs to be discussed further.
It is not entirely true that you have to stand a bit far back to shoot portrait. It still depends on the minimum focus distance and magnification ratio. Traditional 200mm lens for prime and zoom require focus distance about 1.5-1.8m, hence you have to stand far back. and the magnification is low which means the face occupies a small area of the film. But new lens like 70-200 ssm lens have a minimum distance of 1.2m, which allows the photographer to stand nearer while the face occupies a large portion of the film. of coz there are some distance and magnifaction difference between 85/1.4 and 70-200. 70-200 not known for its excellence sharpness. If you already own a 10mm macro D, no need to consider getting another lens as this lens double both portrait and macro lens (AF slow I not too sure, deslim can comment on this). other lens like 135/2.8 no longer in production and can only source second hand market. if you no like fix lens then 80-200 or 70-200 is the one for you. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
I am wondering how much a 200mm prime cost? i going to pp to ask later...
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,051
|
rgds, sulhan |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West, Singapore
Posts: 887
|
and only 200mm fix lens can use original minolta TC.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
Ho , i just go other shops to ask loh...mmm 1.5k ..sounds ok for a fast prime
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 2,603
|
j/kJust set the focus limiter, should be okay for still portraits. If forgotten to set, just see how the lens hunts and zoooooooooommmmmmm all the way in and out.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 2,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
But i got the 50mm and 135mm now....just hoping to zoom alllllll the way for a longer prime zoom mah... btw 85mm cost ?? $1100??? ![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 2,603
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
wonder who got one here??? how is it on the 7d hah?? ![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sing
Posts: 1,537
|
Geno
You can take prize winning portraits with a standard or wide angle lens. I have seen some. You need a talented photographer's eye to spot the picture potential when other photographers cannot. The subject need not fill the frame. The subject can be a small part of the picture, but the surroundings tell something about the person. I used to read Minolta Mirror before they discontinued it. Many pictures inside it were environmental portraits and well taken too. With the Minolta MD manual focus lenses. |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
|
I'd rate the 135 as "best", but the 85 as most versatile by far, and the 100/Soft is mostly just... weird. You can acheive great soft focus effects in Photoshop post-processing, and there is little need for buying a soft focus lens if using digital or scanning film... at least that's my opinion. The 135/STF (which is not "soft focus") is not using the same technology as the Nikon DC lenses. In the latter, you shift elements around manually to over- or undercorrect for spherical aberration, allowing you to control the depth of field and optimize it for front/back bokeh. The Minolta lens uses its apodization element to achieve perfect bokeh, both front and back, all the time -- but you will lose 1.5 stops of light (wide open = 4.5 as light transmission, but 2.8 depth of field). As usual I plug my review: http://www.magnuswedberg.com/docs/stf-review/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 2,603
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
Yeah.... same here... finally understood it too.....
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|