![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reservoir
Posts: 410
|
hey guys,
just conducted an experiment, and got a rather interesting findings. my pictures turned out under-expose, when shoot with TAMRON SP24-135mm with built-in flash and D7D flash menu setting = "ADI FLASH". but this does not occur when i use the other 2 lenses (shown below) or when use with external flash (minolta 3600HS) (under same setting) interestingly, when i changed the D7D flash menu setting to "PRE_TTL FLASH", the exposure is alright. hope this is not confusing... 1) D7D flash menu setting -> "ADI FLASH"; Built-in FLASH -SP24-135: under-expose by >1stop - Minolta 28-80mm(D) & 28-85mm (non-D): OK 2) D7D flash menu setting -> "PRE_TTL FLASH"; Built-in FLASH -SP24-135: OK - Minolta 28-80mm(D) & 28-85mm (non-D): OK 3) D7D flash menu setting -> "ADI FLASH"; Program flash 3600HS -SP24-135: OK - Minolta 28-80mm(D) & 28-85mm (non-D): OK 4) D7D flash menu setting -> "PRE_TTL FLASH"; Program flash 3600HS -SP24-135: OK - Minolta 28-80mm(D) & 28-85mm (non-D): OK in summary, it became under-expose when i use TAMRON SP24-135mm, with built-in flash and D7D flash menu set to ADI_FLASH. this does not happen when use the other 2 lenses tested, use external flash, or change D7D menu flash setting to PRE_TTL FLASH. the object is about 1m away, and i use f/5.6, shutter 1/60s, focal length of 80mm (35mm equiv). note the experiment conditions are the same throughout for the 4 trials. is it just me? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
the 24-135 is a non-D lens, how can ADI work?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,019
|
isn't ADI suppose to work with (D) lenses?
Last edited by Drudkh; 31st March 2005 at 12:59 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Teddy Bear Land
Posts: 2,859
|
![]()
__________________
Take both its legs down first, then cuts its tail, next is shoot between its eyes:devil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Batok West Avenue 2
Posts: 1,739
|
Yeah, ADI is suppose to work only with D lens or other lens which supports the D function, if not it will not work properly...
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reservoir
Posts: 410
|
and when the same setting with external flash, everything seems ok lei. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West, Singapore
Posts: 887
|
is the subject distance the same for both test using different lens? just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 2,603
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reservoir
Posts: 410
|
hmm, was thinking does it only happen to 3rd party non-D lens? will try out other lenses tonight... anyone encountered that before? maybe i should bring to km service center and check it out! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
U might want to let us know what is going on??? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|