Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: sRGB or Adobe RGB

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    150

    Cool sRGB or Adobe RGB

    Read up the difference between these 2 is that, adobe RGB have a bigger spectrum of colour range. But for printing sRGB is suitable.

    A question here, I do not really use photoshop to further enhance my photos, only rarely like converting to BW, or tint to blue colours and some basic effects. Sometimes might print a few photos if I like them around 0.1% of photos taken.

    The file size for sRGB is bigger... now is it better to use sRGB or adobe RGB? Am I losing details/quality if I use one instead of another? Hope any guru or someone with knowledge on this area be able to help!

    Thanks

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: sRGB or Adobe RGB

    do you shoot in RAW? yes? no?
    do you post process your images a lot? yes? no?
    is your monitor calibrated? yes? no?


    anyway..

    if you showcase your image on monitor mainly, use sRGB

    if you make prints from labs, use sRGB,

    if you work on press, use AdobeRGB and output is CMYK
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  4. #4

    Default Re: sRGB or Adobe RGB

    I don't know what and where you read about this , but sRGB is not really suitable for Printing. sRGB has a smaller color spectrum, thats correct. sRGBwas specifically designed for computer screens , to match an RGB Color Spectrum . Adobe RGB 1998 was created specially for printing , to match a CMYK Color space. So, if you want to print your pictures, you better switch to Adobe RGB

  5. #5
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: sRGB or Adobe RGB

    Quote Originally Posted by Achim Reh View Post
    I don't know what and where you read about this , but sRGB is not really suitable for Printing. sRGB has a smaller color spectrum, thats correct. sRGBwas specifically designed for computer screens , to match an RGB Color Spectrum . Adobe RGB 1998 was created specially for printing , to match a CMYK Color space. So, if you want to print your pictures, you better switch to Adobe RGB
    yes, for press, AdobeRGB.



    for making prints from labs (Kodak or Fuji digital labs, etc), you need to have your images in sRGB color space, their machine only accept sRGB.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  6. #6

    Default Re: sRGB or Adobe RGB

    some swear by ProPhoto color space for their widest gamut.
    "You will not be remembered for the gear you used, but by the photographs you created"

  7. #7
    Moderator Octarine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pasir Ris
    Posts
    12,390

    Default Re: sRGB or Adobe RGB

    Quote Originally Posted by user12343 View Post
    some swear by ProPhoto color space for their widest gamut.
    Let's put it this way: many people go for the option of maybe possibly using certain feature in the future ... but forgetting what they actually need today.
    EOS

  8. #8

    Default

    I am usually on sRGB. I haven't done projects that require Adobe RGB. I think most casual photographers are probably best on sRGB.
    KF Photography
    Thanks for viewing!

  9. #9
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: sRGB or Adobe RGB

    Quote Originally Posted by Joelsherry View Post
    Read up the difference between these 2 is that, adobe RGB have a bigger spectrum of colour range. But for printing sRGB is suitable.

    A question here, I do not really use photoshop to further enhance my photos, only rarely like converting to BW, or tint to blue colours and some basic effects. Sometimes might print a few photos if I like them around 0.1% of photos taken.

    The file size for sRGB is bigger... now is it better to use sRGB or adobe RGB? Am I losing details/quality if I use one instead of another? Hope any guru or someone with knowledge on this area be able to help!

    Thanks
    do you shoot in RAW? if yes, setting color space in camera is irrelevant, RAW file don't embed color space, if you process your RAW file in lightroom, the images are develop in ProPhoto, and only when you export the images in tiff or jpg format, than you need to decide which color space to use.

    since you don't use photoshop to enhance the photos, and only print a couple of photos, do you think you really need to use AdobeRGB or ProPhoto color space for all your photos? and convert to sRGB when you want to send for printing?

    monitor and lab prints use sRGB color space, if you camera set at sRGB, you don't do massive editing on the images, what is there any details and quality you have lost?

    and where do you come arcoss the files with sRGB color space are bigger file size? any reference?




    anyway, some of my stock photos are processed and touch up in 8bit tiff file with sRGB color space, export as sRGB jpg and upload to stock agency,
    designers downloaded the photos, manipulate the jpg file further, and I see some of the photos are printed in large banners, posters, even on double decker bus.

    so don't be too concern on any details and quality loss of using different color space. you won't notice any different at all.
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •