ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Nikon

Nikon At the heart of the image


 
Thread Tools
Old 10th March 2005   #1
Aimz
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 34
Question Nikkor AF 50mm f/1.4D or 1.8D? Any advice?

I intent to use the lens for potrait photography cant decide newbie seekin advice.. Thanks

Last edited by Aimz; 10th March 2005 at 01:53 AM.
Aimz is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #2
roti
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sgp/China/TW
Posts: 743
Default

hmm....i dun think u really need a f/1.4 lens to shoot a portrait....but its always good to hav a faster lens....comes in handy when u need it esp when u start to change ur style of shooting.....
roti is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #3
RockPopCorns
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jurong
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by Aimz
I intent to use the lens for potrait photography cant decide newbie seekin advice.. Thanks
this had been discussed many times, do a search on nikon sub forum.
RockPopCorns is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 10th March 2005   #4
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

Go for the 1.8, the difference is not that great to warrant an additional $300+ bucks for a heavier and half-stop more light.

Unless you're talking about the 85mm...
espn is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #5
Pro Image
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Last planet from the sun
Posts: 2,822
Default

Originally Posted by Aimz
I intent to use the lens for potrait photography cant decide newbie seekin advice.. Thanks
No need to think about it. The 50mm f1.8 is good enuf. BTW, to get the sharpess and finer details, usually I will stop down to f2.8
Pro Image is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #6
KNIGHT ONG
Senior Member
 
KNIGHT ONG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Snow Mountain
Posts: 5,729
Default

Got the $$$, go for the f1.4 else f1.8 oso good enough ..
__________________
AMPA * Studio * J team
KNIGHT ONG is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #7
Paul_Yeo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sengkang
Posts: 2,156
Default

buy whatever is cheaper
__________________
www.boo.sg
Paul_Yeo is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #8
2100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,116
Default

If you don't do lots of bokeh stuff, it's a no brainer, 50/1.8. Actually if you really want bokeh then you shouldn't be looking at both anyway. haha...
2100 is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #9
Witness
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.maverickatwork.com
Posts: 6,768
Default

wat do u need the half a stop for???
__________________
w maverick.photography
b maverick.blogging
Witness is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #10
Big Kahuna
Senior Member
 
Big Kahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,678
Default

Buy lah buy lah....my avatar is shot using this lens
__________________
Takuya Kimura has chosen Nikon. When will you?
Big Kahuna is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #11
ortega
Moderator
 
ortega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 16,507
Default

Originally Posted by Witness
wat do u need the half a stop for???
low light + hand held situations, the half stop could make or break the shot.

But then it's better to get a monopod.
__________________
The Law
ortega is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #12
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

Originally Posted by ortega
low light + hand held situations, the half stop could make or break the shot.

But then it's better to get a monopod.
There's ISO for that. Crank it up.
espn is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #13
jeff49er
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Punggol Park
Posts: 2,020
Default 85mm f1.4

Originally Posted by espn
Go for the 1.8, the difference is not that great to warrant an additional $300+ bucks for a heavier and half-stop more light.

Unless you're talking about the 85mm...

BUY BUY BUY
jeff49er is online now  
Old 10th March 2005   #14
ortega
Moderator
 
ortega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 16,507
Default

Originally Posted by espn
There's ISO for that. Crank it up.
Once you hit the max the extra 1/2 stop will come in useful.
(less camera shake)
Don't you think?

BTW I try not to exceed 400 ISO
__________________
The Law
ortega is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #15
cy_j
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Newton
Posts: 727
Default

Originally Posted by ortega

BTW I try not to exceed 400 ISO
Ditto that. Specially on my D70.
cy_j is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #16
espn
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
Default

Originally Posted by ortega
Once you hit the max the extra 1/2 stop will come in useful.
(less camera shake)
Don't you think?

BTW I try not to exceed 400 ISO
Have yet to hit 1600 on a D70 using a 50 f/1.8

ISO800 is ok ma... no big issue.
espn is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #17
eawtan
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampines
Posts: 1,090
Default

Originally Posted by espn
Go for the 1.8, the difference is not that great to warrant an additional $300+ bucks for a heavier and half-stop more light.

Unless you're talking about the 85mm...
I believe 1.4 -> 1.8 is 2/3 stop.
eawtan is offline  
Old 10th March 2005   #18
jnet6
Senior Member
 
jnet6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,259
Default

Originally Posted by eawtan
I believe 1.4 -> 1.8 is 2/3 stop.
Try and see which1 u will "fall in love with"......
__________________
Tamron lenses sale...
I'll be away till 1st week of Dec09, so keep your PM coming in. thanks!
jnet6 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.11900 seconds with 7 queries