![]() |
|
|||||||
| Reportage and Sports Photojournalistic, Reportage, Events Coverage, Sports Illustrated. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
|
Hi,
I will be going to F1 race. Wonder what film should i bring considering the speed of the car zooming pass. Any advice? ISO 400/800? Kodak or Fuji? Thanks. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in bet MORE diaper changes...
Posts: 14,564
|
either film will do. as for ISO, IMO, the higher the better since it allows u to shoot as close to 'normal' shutter speeds (say 1/125sec) as possible.
more imptly, do u have the lenses to shoot? a few of my colleagues went sepang last yr, and they were hard-pressed to get a decent shot of the F1 cars from the gallery with 300mm+2x TC.... ![]()
__________________
When did ignorance become a point of view? - Dilbert budget AD/ROM shooter, anyone? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
|
hi,
thank you for your advice. I am thinking with ISO 800 will it cause over exposure? If that is the case that means i will have to set very fast shutter rite? But if i want to freeze the action it has to be slow shutter? So I am a bit confuse. What at gallery still difficult to get decent shot.... hmm i am using 300mm guess i won't be able to capture anything fantastic then! |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in bet MORE diaper changes...
Posts: 14,564
|
since u using film, u have to bear in mind the relation bet ISO, shutter speed and aperature. okie... if i'm wrong, will the gurus of sports/events correct, pls? High ISO allows u to use a slower shutter speed and smaller aperature (f8, f11, f16 etc..). the smaller aperature will allow u to get a very sharp pic. the trade-off is higher grain in pic. if u wanna freeze action, u need a high shutter speed. higher shutter speed will also cut down the amt of light reaching ur film, which forces u to open up ur aperature (f4, f2.8 etc..). this may cause u to OOF ur cars becos of the shallow depth of field (DOF). so, back to high ISO film. 300mm can, depending on where u are sitting, i guess. if u can get close to the tracks, i suppose u can get decent shots. oh yeah, do remember to use a monopod too for stability.
__________________
When did ignorance become a point of view? - Dilbert budget AD/ROM shooter, anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 788
|
http://www.andylees.com/shooting_f1/shooting_f1.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,719
|
daylight no need to use ISO 800. since ISO 400 will more than suffice
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Singapore, Australia
Posts: 166
|
Use ISO 100 for most most situations, I would go ISO 50 if the lights allow it. Shooting in such a wide open space means you have more lights available than you think. Was shooting on-track Sepang for a private event a few years back and I was having problem with ISO 400 cuz it was too bright and I had to be shooting at f16 or 22 most of the time.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|