![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beeshan
Posts: 1,809
|
hi guys,
am a newbie using D70. i realised my colours tend to be kinda flat. is there anyway i can have rich/saturated colours without going thru post processing? or is there some probs with the way i shoot or something that i still dun know abt some sample pics here http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthrea...55#post1139755 thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Beyond Space-Time Continuum
Posts: 5,921
|
try set your D70 for vivid colors.
__________________
Selling: 32GB Thumbdrive - Patriot Xporter XT 120sgd (Price reduced) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Colors look ok to me... got flat meh?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,252
|
maybe try the custom curve to bring out more "live" or highlights meter at right spot.
__________________
Tamron lenses sale... I'll be away till 1st week of Dec09, so keep your PM coming in. thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beeshan
Posts: 1,809
|
custom curve?
heard that there is this function in D70, but how do i utilise it correctly? espn : but someone commented that its flat leh. heehee, anyway, i oso dun really noe how to judge when its flat or too saturated could it be monitor calibration prob? using PS CS, so shd have the adobe gamma calibrating thingy rite? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moon
Posts: 376
|
my monitor is calibrated. The color is not flat but rather dull (unsaturated).
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beeshan
Posts: 1,809
|
hi,could u educate me on wats the diff btw flat and unsaturated?(all along i thought it meant the same)
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 383
|
I noticed you have an A80, so probably you're more used to the colours that the powershot gives, which is richly saturated and bright. If you like that kinda output you can also prob tweak the d70 to do likewise I don't own the d70 but I've been playing with my friend's one and his appears tweaked for more saturation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 412
|
I went through your pics, I think the problem lies in two steps:
First the exposure is not ideal for each scene. You cannot expect the camera to know what you are shooting. Most of the scenes you showed were those that required understanding of how to get a proper exposure. Second, you NEED post-processing. Going to digital, the first thing you should realise is that when you used to shoot film, the post-processing was a tedious task done by a lab technician. Now, you are your own digital lab technician. That said, the D70 is more than capable of shooting out of the camera jpegs with good saturation and minimum fuss. Here's a few things you should practice, practice and practice with; 1. Exposure. Get it right. Use A or M mode. Tell the camera what you want, not the other way around. 2. White balance: the correct white balance is important (Not easy to master. Try to use preset white balance, learn how it works) 3. Medium or medium high sharpening 4. normal saturation. 5. Practice a lot! When I switched to digital, the biggest pain was post-processing skills. Now, I hardly worry, having mastered the camera, and the requisite skills in photoshop. Capturing the image is only half the job done. I just sold a 80x120 print to a client for 1500 euros. From a measly 4mpix camera. I hope this helps. If you need more advice, you can ask here, or also look around at robgalbraith.com forums, digital processing. J |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||||
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
![]()
![]() |
||||
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 790
|
Hi,
I recently learned the value of using spot metering instead of matrix. Depending on the situation, particularly in intense contrast between light, I find that matrix often gets it wrong on my D70. Learning to use spot metering did the trick nicely. Also, changing your color space to sRGB and setting tone to medium or high gives you better colors. Experiment and see if it works for you too. If all else fails, esp when you want to minimize post processing, use custom curve. I'm using the fotogenic custome curve and that works great for skin tones. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beeshan
Posts: 1,809
|
thanks guys...
time to hit the manual again...will try and post if i still cant get the proper colours! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: not here often anymore
Posts: 6,252
|
need to learn more PS power. hahaha
__________________
Tamron lenses sale... I'll be away till 1st week of Dec09, so keep your PM coming in. thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,719
|
where got flat? the tone is rather natural looking
but some portions of the pixs are underexposed |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moon
Posts: 376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beeshan
Posts: 1,809
|
erm..what is got flat?
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central West
Posts: 1,913
|
Hey mate,
There's nothing wrong with the saturation of your pictures - they don't appear "flat" to me, just a couple of your pictures are underexposed. Some people prefer much more saturated colours, but I prefer more natural looking colours - depends on your own preference. If you really do want to increase saturation straight out of the camera with no post-processing, try this - increase saturation to "enhanced", use colour mode IIIa for more saturated reds and greens, load a custom curve. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|