ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > General, Reviews, Tech Talk

General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat.


 
Thread Tools
Old 26th February 2005   #1
yumepoi
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Default Questions on Slide Films

Hi,

I just remembered to drop this questions on this forum. When I was to buy my first slide film, I was confounded by a variety of slide film products available in the market. Even one make could come out with different products: velvia, provia, astia for Fuji; Ektachrome, elite chrome

I believe they serve different purposes. I've searched the net regarding their purposes and intended use but could not find satisfactory answer. Could anyone enlighten me regarding this? Thanks for reading !!

Regards
yumepoi is offline  
Old 26th February 2005   #2
justarius
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western side of Singapore
Posts: 1,163
Default

The main difference lies in their colour rendition and saturation. Velvia is extremely saturated and is suited more for nature and landscape work to give the extra punch. Provia and Astia are more accurate in their colour rendition and isn't as vivid. Here's a quick guide:
http://www.nikonians.org/html/resour...eferences.html
justarius is offline  
Old 26th February 2005   #3
theITguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In this small world
Posts: 2,042
Default

Generally saying, Velvia 50/100 is great for wildlife, landscape, buildings, very sharp and high contrast and of course saturated and vivid. Provia100F/400F is sharp (not as sharp as Velvia 50), like a general purpose slide but can have different output depending on the weather. Astia is less contrast, neutral colour and extremely fine grain, very good for portrait.
theITguy is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 27th February 2005   #4
whoelse
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,227
Default

There are some comparison here, click the url, look at the bottom:
http://www.gustafson.tk/
whoelse is offline  
Old 27th February 2005   #5
RichardSeah
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: AMK
Posts: 231
Default

Originally Posted by justarius
The main difference lies in their colour rendition and saturation. Velvia is extremely saturated and is suited more for nature and landscape work to give the extra punch. Provia and Astia are more accurate in their colour rendition and isn't as vivid. Here's a quick guide:
http://www.nikonians.org/html/resour...eferences.html
What about Kodak Ektachrome / Elite chrome?

Seems like everybody using and recommending Fuji these days, including me. I used to assume that Kodak was “best” – because I out of touch with photography for many years. But after reading reviews etc swtiched to Fuji.

Anybody has experience to share about Kodak slides?
RichardSeah is offline  
Old 27th February 2005   #6
Stefen
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Beijing
Posts: 445
Default

I started using kodak elite chrome 100 first... i thought they were pretty good....till I used the velvia.

now i can't switch back....
__________________
www.stefenchow.com
Stefen is offline  
Old 27th February 2005   #7
boochap
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sg - bukit ho swee
Posts: 1,303
Default

was using kodak then provia and velvia...switched to astia...very happy with astia.

..kodak sux..
boochap is offline  
Old 3rd March 2005   #8
RichardSeah
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: AMK
Posts: 231
Default

Originally Posted by boochap
..kodak sux..
Ah so!

This must be why my recent slides look better – colours seem more lively, more details, etc – than my old slides which seem flat in comparison.

Last time I used Kodak, now Fuji.
RichardSeah is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.07344 seconds with 7 queries