Page 33 of 104 FirstFirst ... 82328313233343538435883 ... LastLast
Results 641 to 660 of 2073

Thread: Sentosa Thread IV

  1. #641

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkForce
    Something to read when u guys are free http://www.dantestella.com/technical/fast2.html
    Actually the fastest production lens is canon's f0.95.. cant remember if it's 50mm or 35mm..

    That's why I chose the "L" over ED.
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  2. #642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nightwolf75
    actually, i was thinking of the 120mm mortar base-plate... u know, the one the mount on the M113 APC floor...
    Wah that one

    Angel will surely mati... then really become DA
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  3. #643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Garion
    50-500 f2.8....

    Imagine how big the front element would be. It would weight...8kg?

    I wonder if DO technology helps here
    Last edited by CYRN; 22nd February 2005 at 01:27 PM.
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  4. #644
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CYRN
    I wonder if DO technologu helps here
    DF technology better
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

  5. #645

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkForce
    DF technology better
    DF got what technology? Dark using whites... only become gray cards leh...lol
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  6. #646
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CYRN
    DF got what technology? Dark using whites... only become gray cards leh...lol
    18% Grey or 12% Grey ?
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

  7. #647

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkForce
    18% Grey or 12% Grey ?
    That's where yout "Force" comes to play... you can be any shades of grey...
    Gallery | Facebook Page Spreading the Good photography.

  8. #648
    Senior Member scud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,808

    Default

    DA, MS amk has 3 new sets of 17-40L. just arrives.
    u may want to check it out.

  9. #649
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CYRN
    That's where yout "Force" comes to play... you can be any shades of grey...
    DF technology is to connect your camera , lens and flash to the Car battery for more POWER .....

    Super damn powerful
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

  10. #650
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scud
    DA, MS amk has 3 new sets of 17-40L. just arrives.
    u may want to check it out.
    Hi Scud,

    Could u enlighten me why go for 17-40L instead of 16-35L ? 17 better than 16 ?
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

  11. #651
    Senior Member scud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,808

    Default

    u pay the dif in price, then i get the 16-35L.

  12. #652
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Dry cabinet!
    Posts
    1,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkForce
    Hi Scud,

    Could u enlighten me why go for 17-40L instead of 16-35L ? 17 better than 16 ?
    Well... e price difference of cos!!! Nearly $1000
    Actually seldom will shoot wide angle at f2.8. Can make do with f4. For group shots normally shoot f4 to f5.6
    Dreaming... 14mm f2.8, 16-35 f2.8 mkII, 85 f1.2 mkII

  13. #653
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
    Posts
    12,716

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkForce
    Hi Scud,

    Could u enlighten me why go for 17-40L instead of 16-35L ? 17 better than 16 ?
    Cheaper price and lighter weight? But at the expense of speed.

    Some say the picture quality of 17-40L is better than the 16-35L or 17-35L?

  14. #654
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scud
    u pay the dif in price, then i get the 16-35L.
    OIC. Thanks
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

  15. #655
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gryphon
    Well... e price difference of cos!!! Nearly $1000
    Actually seldom will shoot wide angle at f2.8. Can make do with f4. For group shots normally shoot f4 to f5.6
    Diff by $1000 ? Wow .....

    Now I see.

    Thanks
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

  16. #656
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJ23
    Cheaper price and lighter weight? But at the expense of speed.

    Some say the picture quality of 17-40L is better than the 16-35L or 17-35L?
    Better picture quality ? Then who own that lens must be a happy guy loh
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

  17. #657
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Town of Queens doing PORT-9YOU
    Posts
    12,716

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkForce
    Better picture quality ? Then who own that lens must be a happy guy loh
    That I don't know.

  18. #658
    Senior Member scud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJ23
    Cheaper price and lighter weight? But at the expense of speed.

    Some say the picture quality of 17-40L is better than the 16-35L or 17-35L?
    speed? i can make do with f4. no way i will pay $1K for additional 1 stop.
    workaround, i can either push iso higher or using slower shutter speed.
    compared pic quality, 17-40L is better than 16-35L at f4.

    AJ, u gg to seed tml?

  19. #659
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Dry cabinet!
    Posts
    1,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJ23
    Cheaper price and lighter weight? But at the expense of speed.

    Some say the picture quality of 17-40L is better than the 16-35L or 17-35L?
    Yes i hear but can't verify tat claim.
    Besides, DF, u dun shoot landscape (scenery) at f2.8.
    U dun shoot portait wif 16-35 due to distortion of wide angle, so no need f2.8 to blur background.
    The only time i think to shoot wide angle at f2.8 is at events wif poor lighting & yr flash can't throw light too far or in places where flash not allowed, like at some churches.

    Thats why f4 L lens are one of the reasons why ppl choose Canon over Nikon
    Dreaming... 14mm f2.8, 16-35 f2.8 mkII, 85 f1.2 mkII

  20. #660
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    newbie land
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AJ23
    That I don't know.
    Well if you pay the diff to let Scud get one, he should be very happy
    寒冰不能斷流水 枯木亦會再逢春

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •