Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Pentax K-5 WR test

  1. #1
    Member TheFuhrer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    53

    Default Pentax K-5 WR test

    Inspired by this thread, I was not quite satisfied at the quality of my pictures. "It has to have more 'ooomph' in the photos," I thought.

    I've always read people discussing of Pentax's WR abilities, but never shown the deliberate abuse (not that I know of anyway). Not many dare (or are foolish) enough to try it out I guess. So here I am here with the pictures of my K-5 being abused. Sounds harsh, ain't it? Well to my K-5, it's just another shower.

    Oh, and I have the courage to do this because I've done it before. Heck, if the K-5 could talk, it would tell you that he had been through worst... Like tasting ice cream. :3

    Without further ado... Here's the K-5.



    Ooops. Water poured on the lens barrel. Could it be anymore worse?



    Yup. Water poured on the camera body.



    The K-5 after a shower.

    Last edited by TheFuhrer; 12th October 2012 at 12:48 AM.
    Qoo?

  2. #2
    Member TheFuhrer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    But wait, there's more! How about pouring water at the back of the camera?



    Let's not forget the viewfinder.



    How much water have been poured? Well, just look at how much water is flowing down from the K-5 grip and lens hood.



    The fully drenched K-5.



    I know it doesn't really count since the K-5 wasn't switched on. I should have done that, but the battery's at home in the battery grip. Yes, that battery grip is a third-party accessory and I don't think it's really WR like it claims.

    Anyway, the purpose of this thread is to remind ourselves to not be afraid to abuse the camera a little. More so if it's a WR-enabled camera. Note my abuse and know that you are safe when taking photos in the rain (or snow) because my K-5 has been through more.

    Oh, I forgot to add that the "exposed" hotshoe does no harm to the camera. Previously I thought that the water might short-circuit the K-5 from the exposed hotshoe. Guess I was wrong.
    Last edited by TheFuhrer; 11th October 2012 at 09:56 PM.
    Qoo?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    21 gun salute......
    ....

  4. #4

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Ha..ha...nice one!

    I like how you have that little K5 on the big bro K5 too

    In fact, I've just got fresh photos for that 'Dare' thread.
    As I just walked through the children's spray shower with K5 in hand (all sprayed with water), I could spy with my little eye a parent (with the typical canikon) at the pool try to eye what camera was capable of such a feat.

  5. #5
    Member TheFuhrer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Quote Originally Posted by poseur View Post
    21 gun salute......
    Haha. Thank you... (I suppose)?

    Quote Originally Posted by pinholecam View Post
    Ha..ha...nice one!

    I like how you have that little K5 on the big bro K5 too

    In fact, I've just got fresh photos for that 'Dare' thread.
    As I just walked through the children's spray shower with K5 in hand (all sprayed with water), I could spy with my little eye a parent (with the typical canikon) at the pool try to eye what camera was capable of such a feat.
    And when they learned it's water-resistant, the next question they will ask is, "can shoot underwater?"

    While shooting this, an uncle approached me and gave a horrid look. He said, "you pouring water over your camera!?"

    I said yes, and the next thing is asked was "can take photos underwater?" I explained to him it's weather-resistant, not water-proof. "What brand? Pantex?" He chuckled and went on his way.
    Qoo?

  6. #6

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    wow. respect.

  7. #7

    Default

    Thumbs up on a local demo in pics. I've had chances to shoot in pools n wet playgrounds in my trusty k7 n 16-50 or 18-135.
    Must say I've noticed quite a few curious peeks at our p brand
    For sure I've not seen any other dslr's in such environments.
    May the force be with you...

  8. #8

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    That mini pentax (hotshoe cover?) is too cute!

  9. #9
    Member TheFuhrer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Quote Originally Posted by hellfire88 View Post
    wow. respect.


    Quote Originally Posted by dielah View Post
    Thumbs up on a local demo in pics. I've had chances to shoot in pools n wet playgrounds in my trusty k7 n 16-50 or 18-135.
    Must say I've noticed quite a few curious peeks at our p brand
    For sure I've not seen any other dslr's in such environments.
    Yeah. Sadly not many would believe when I tell that that my K-5 can do what I claim (its WR abilities). Hence these photos are up on my FB. And since it's Pentax related, I thought it would be nice to post it here too.

    Quote Originally Posted by SilentSeth View Post
    That mini pentax (hotshoe cover?) is too cute!
    Haha. I bought it online though. There's a thread on this somewhere here..
    Qoo?

  10. #10

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    If camera is switch on and hotshoe exposed, I seriously wonder if it will short circuit.

  11. #11
    Member Cenvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Singapore - West Side
    Posts
    308

    Default

    With camera switch on and hot shoes exposed confirm it won't short circuit! Done that before.
    Shoot in heavy down pour with my trusty 16-50. Another time is at beach when wave attack... have to rinse the whole cam with tap water after seawater... no sweat, I trust my equipment!
    I more worry about my tripod actually.. sand went in between joints.. dismantle whole tripod to clean.. do look out for it
    ペンタックス K1 K5, FA31, FA77, DA15, DA* 16-50, Sigma 10-20, Metz 58 AF-2

  12. #12
    Member TheFuhrer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Quote Originally Posted by Cenvin View Post
    With camera switch on and hot shoes exposed confirm it won't short circuit! Done that before.
    Shoot in heavy down pour with my trusty 16-50. Another time is at beach when wave attack... have to rinse the whole cam with tap water after seawater... no sweat, I trust my equipment!
    I more worry about my tripod actually.. sand went in between joints.. dismantle whole tripod to clean.. do look out for it
    Second this. I've shot with the hot shoe exposed before too.
    Qoo?

  13. #13

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Ok, glad to hear hotshoe exposed is fine.

  14. #14
    Senior Member felixcat8888's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    9,108

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    It really shows our WR is really WR
    Pentaxian for Life
    K1, KP, FA*28-70/2.8, FA31, 43 & FA77 Limiteds, K85/1.8, FA*200/2.8, A50/1.2



  15. #15
    Member simon6z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Near Bishan Park Macdonald
    Posts
    812

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Don't test like that wait people jealous how? Wait other players up their game and price and create more marketing on their products how? People will jump and sink our ship you know hahahaha and when we go for outing it is like rioting hahahaha
    Sony A7II FE 28 Zeiss 55 FE 90 Sigma 150-600C

  16. #16
    Senior Member edutilos-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    The Universe
    Posts
    5,991

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Quote Originally Posted by Cenvin View Post
    With camera switch on and hot shoes exposed confirm it won't short circuit! Done that before.
    Shoot in heavy down pour with my trusty 16-50. Another time is at beach when wave attack... have to rinse the whole cam with tap water after seawater... no sweat, I trust my equipment!
    I more worry about my tripod actually.. sand went in between joints.. dismantle whole tripod to clean.. do look out for it
    Use wooden tripod.... It will still have problems with sand but much less, especially if you deploy it to ensure that the joint (which is not enclosed) does not enter the sand. Metal tripods as long as got water go in got chance of sand going in... It takes a lot more to affect joint of wooden tripod from my experience.. Still have gotten it stuck now and then though, but cleaning is so much easier than metal tripod.

    Not cheap though... And quite bulky. But well worth the lessened trouble. Plus wood seems to have a lot less problem with corrosion.

  17. #17
    Senior Member edutilos-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    The Universe
    Posts
    5,991

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    I won't worry about other brands upping their game.

    If they want to up, they up long ago... The big brands probably won't bother because they are banking on other things such as word-of-mouth and aggressive advertising, which works for them for so long. That's a sad fact of life.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    Actually no big deal. I used to shoot in moderate rain back when I was using my K20D. Me and my K20D both very drenched during the shoot. Pentax WR is really WR.
    Aaron Neo | flickr

  19. #19

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    lemme just add a pic taken by a friend...my K-5 under the rain




  20. #20
    Deregistered allenleonhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,656
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Pentax K-5 WR test

    a k-5 on a k-5.

    k-ception

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •