![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
This is my first try at IR. I tried 2 different processes. Comments appreciated.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Blue/Green Planet
Posts: 1,855
|
Hi jmba,
You use the Canon 10D ? (in your profile). The first one probably needed longer exposure time. The 20D definately needs long exposures I find. #2 is definately getting there. I am not good at PS but I would guess teerex would like a play with your photo. You set the CWB to a green tree or grass ? Cheers
__________________
Time, is an effortless construction :) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,224
|
Wah, jbma. You no long shooting the sunbird but shooting IR liao ah?
Think yo uneed to learn more from the experts here. haha Try more, shoot more. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,653
|
Nice to know that expert photographers like jbma and sumball are reading the IR forum and are beginning to join in shooting IR. We definitely can learn a lot from these guys, hope that more expert photogs will come in and share their expertise with us.
jbma, my opinions of your 2 shots. #1 seem ok, may require a little longer exposure like pablo mentioned. Don't know if that is the cause of the dark sky, but can try longer exposure to find out if that is the cause. I took the liberty to ps that pic to get white foliage and I think white foliage looks better. But then, unless you like the purplish tinge in the foliage then that's fine. You may wish to have a look for comparison - #2 seem like it over exposed in the center of the shot or is it what they call hot spot. I have also done some ps to that pix to bring down the brightness in the center and given it white foliage. But then I guess you are better than many of us at ps. Those are just my opinions. Keep Shooting and show. Pablo - you guessed right ![]() Last edited by teerex; 12th February 2005 at 06:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
Last edited by jbma; 14th February 2005 at 09:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,224
|
Dun sabo me lar , I am no expert photographer but IR is good. Any idea how much is a 72mm Hoya R72 filter cost? Wanna try on my 300D with my Tamron 24-135mm lens. Any idea of this combo? Can take IR? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Small island....
Posts: 1,563
|
Join us on the outings. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Small island....
Posts: 1,563
|
Hey jbma!
Great to have another IR photgrapher in our midst! Hope to see more posts from you soon. All that I can comment on the pictures have already been covered. Keep them coming.... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,653
|
I don't exactly know the price of the 72mm R72 but as Adiemus has indicated it's more than S$170/-. As he has said, don't let that stop you. If you have a smaller diameter lens maybe one of the guys can let you try it on the 300D before you throw in the cash. But then if you want to test it with the Tamron, don't think anyone has tried IR with that lens. Watch out for our next shoot, come join us and see what we can work out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,653
|
Yes, IR filters for large diameter lenses are very expensive. As a alternative you may wish to have a try with acrylic IR filters like the Cokin P007, this is a 3" x 3" filter where you may be able to just hold it over the lens while you shoot if you do not have the holder. But the P007 gives different results from the Hoya R72. I use my 67mm R72 on a Sigma Super Macro II APO with the help of a step up filter, 58mm to 67mm. Depending on the diameter of your long zoom, you may wish to take this option to have one IR filter to fit most of your lenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,653
|
67mm Hoya R72 about 2 months back from TK - around S$80/- Sizes above 67mm are . This may serve as a guide to prices of the R72. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,673
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tampines
Posts: 3,315
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|