ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > General Discussions > Newbies Corner

Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP.


 
Thread Tools
Old 26th January 2005   #1
snemeis
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 113
Default Wide Angle Lens

Hi All

Can anyone recommend a ok wide angle lens for F80 usage? I travel quite often and as such need to take some Landscapes shot.

How much will it cost? Will I be able to buy one at around less than SGD450?

Thanks in advance.
snemeis is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #2
Kei
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,090
Default

Are you looking for a fixed focal length or variable focal length lens?
Kei is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #3
Winston
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 663
Default

Originally Posted by snemeis
Hi All

Can anyone recommend a ok wide angle lens for F80 usage? I travel quite often and as such need to take some Landscapes shot.

How much will it cost? Will I be able to buy one at around less than SGD450?

Thanks in advance.
for <$450.
Hmm...I think Cathay Photo has a promo on back then abt a Tokina 19-35mm wide angle lens for $300+

Not the best of wides, but it fits ur budget.
Good wides aint cheap.
Winston is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 27th January 2005   #4
satan_18349
Member
 
satan_18349's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hell 極樂世&
Posts: 1,505
Default

The Tokina 19-35 only cost around $199 now... Its a great sharp lens at low cost...
satan_18349 is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #5
XXX Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
Posts: 1,104
Default

Get a 2nd hand Nikkor 20mm f2.8.
XXX Boy is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #6
Astin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Astin Studio
Posts: 4,724
Default

The Nikkor 20mm f2.8 is very good!
The 2nd hand price is abt $500+ so slightly more than your budget.
Astin is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #7
snemeis
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 113
Default

Thank you all for the replies, one small question what is the difference with the fixed or non fixed focal length.
snemeis is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #8
ortega
Moderator
 
ortega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 16,507
Default

Originally Posted by snemeis
Thank you all for the replies, one small question what is the difference with the fixed or non fixed focal length.
Zoom???

I'd say get the tokina 17mm from CP for landscapes.
Don't know how much it costs now, but I think that it is on sale.
__________________
The Law
ortega is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #9
XXX Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
Posts: 1,104
Talking

Originally Posted by Astin
The Nikkor 20mm f2.8 is very good!
The 2nd hand price is abt $500+ so slightly more than your budget.
But it is really a good lens and worth the investment rather than getting other 3rd parties one, dun you think so?
XXX Boy is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #10
ortega
Moderator
 
ortega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 16,507
Default

just buy what you can afford, a good lens and a great lens will still take a picture.
The nikkor is a good lens that is worth the investment, but not everyone has the unlimited budget to get the best all the time, I am such a person. With $500 I can get 2 lenses instead of one.
__________________
The Law
ortega is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #11
PrintGuy
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Side of the Island
Posts: 40
Default

Originally Posted by satan_18349
The Tokina 19-35 only cost around $199 now... Its a great sharp lens at low cost...
check out last week was told it was out of stock.
PrintGuy is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #12
XXX Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
Posts: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by ortega
just buy what you can afford, a good lens and a great lens will still take a picture.
The nikkor is a good lens that is worth the investment, but not everyone has the unlimited budget to get the best all the time, I am such a person. With $500 I can get 2 lenses instead of one.
Sorry that I might sound mean. No offence really!
But for me, I would rather save up more for a better lens.
XXX Boy is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #13
ortega
Moderator
 
ortega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 16,507
Default

no offence taken, don't sweat it. Just posting my view for the benifit of the so called newbies that are suppose to be reading this tread.

I would want to save up for a better lens too, but for a newbie who is just starting out, I would not advise to buy expansive stuff until you decide on what you want to shoot and how you want to shoot it. After which, you can make that investment in a great lens, as XXX Boy mentioned.

eg. you buy a dedicated macro lens to shoot macro because you see all the great macro pictures in this forum and after trying to shoot macro for 6 months or more, you decide that you prefer to shoot girls, so your macro lens goes to the B&S forum and you make a loss, after which you must buy another lens for shooting girls.

See my point? Let me know if you disagree, I enjoy a good debate.
__________________
The Law
ortega is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #14
hongsien
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,904
Default

Originally Posted by XXX Boy
But it is really a good lens and worth the investment rather than getting other 3rd parties one, dun you think so?
Not all third party lenses are of lesser quality than the 'camerabranded' ones, the Tokina is one fine example........don't get too much fixed to only brands.....anyway, at 35mm its hard to see the differences....

HS
hongsien is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #15
Astin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Astin Studio
Posts: 4,724
Default

Originally Posted by XXX Boy
But it is really a good lens and worth the investment rather than getting other 3rd parties one, dun you think so?
Of course I agree, thats why I also got 1 myself, still loving it after all these years.
Astin is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #16
XXX Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
Posts: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by hongsien
Not all third party lenses are of lesser quality than the 'camerabranded' ones, the Tokina is one fine example........don't get too much fixed to only brands.....anyway, at 35mm its hard to see the differences....

HS
I need to be clear here, I did not say that 3rd party lens have lousy quality!
I still buy first party lenses for my system (all 2nd hand due to no $$$) mainly I believe in its after-sales service. I would really doubt that Sigma, Tokina, Cosina, Tamron and etc can offer professional after-sales service like those first party lens manufacturers.
After sales service meant alot to me and I believe to many other photographers here too!
XXX Boy is offline  
Old 27th January 2005   #17
XXX Boy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
Posts: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by ortega
no offence taken, don't sweat it. Just posting my view for the benifit of the so called newbies that are suppose to be reading this tread.

I would want to save up for a better lens too, but for a newbie who is just starting out, I would not advise to buy expansive stuff until you decide on what you want to shoot and how you want to shoot it. After which, you can make that investment in a great lens, as XXX Boy mentioned.

eg. you buy a dedicated macro lens to shoot macro because you see all the great macro pictures in this forum and after trying to shoot macro for 6 months or more, you decide that you prefer to shoot girls, so your macro lens goes to the B&S forum and you make a loss, after which you must buy another lens for shooting girls.

See my point? Let me know if you disagree, I enjoy a good debate.
Yeah, well-said! I agree wif you!!!
XXX Boy is offline  
Old 10th February 2005   #18
ray_stinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: behind my camera
Posts: 1,952
Default

To save yourself from the worries of depreciation, always get second hand.
ray_stinger is offline  
Old 11th February 2005   #19
tommon
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Currently, Singapore but hope
Posts: 729
Default

Well a zoom will allow you to use with a varying circumstances while a fixed focal length means you and your camera shift to recompose the scene to fit your frame.

Fixed lens are far more superior because the lens element are purposed build to suit the lens. Zoom lens elements are build to suit the varying situation of the focal length. If you decide to buy a zoom lens, go for those with a constant f/2.8 aperture as they are often more superior in the image quality and also better in their resale value.

A good range is to go from 17mm to 35mm, Sigma, Tokina produced very good lenses for Nikon SLR. The nikon lenses are way too expensive for my taste where the quality is only marginally better.
tommon is offline  
Old 11th February 2005   #20
user111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,719
Default

nikkor 18-35 /3.5-4.5 ED
user111 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.12515 seconds with 7 queries