Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Info on contax systems

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    B.Timah, New york, SoCal.
    Posts
    930

    Default Info on contax systems

    Anyone know the price of the Contax SLR RTS III new, used, and if anyplace in singapore still sells this body?

    and also for the 50 1.4 tmm lense?

    thanks

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    B.Timah, New york, SoCal.
    Posts
    930

    Default

    Har... no one in singapore using contax slrs anymore meh?

    wah...

    come on brothers... any idea of the price of teh rts III? i called cathay but the ppl there didn't seem to know anything about it...

    i'll try calling again tmrw i guess..

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    www.whltelightphotographer.com
    Posts
    1,834

    Default

    It use to sell for $2.8K but that is a long long long long time a ago

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    B.Timah, New york, SoCal.
    Posts
    930

    Default

    ooo kam sia kam sia... at least now i know the rought price gauge...

    tmrw i go knock the ang moh here for cheap cheap... hehehe

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    In the void.
    Posts
    1,323

    Default

    Bought one 2 years ago, 2nd hand. Around $2100.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    B.Timah, New york, SoCal.
    Posts
    930

    Default

    how's it been working for u?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Under the Son
    Posts
    2,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F5user
    Anyone know the price of the Contax SLR RTS III new, used, and if anyplace in singapore still sells this body?

    and also for the 50 1.4 tmm lense?

    thanks
    got one person last time selling only $200 for 50mm lens, here quite often to find the 50 f/1.4 T 2nd hand, i think keh, adorama and b&H quite of number they have.
    ubans.com

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    B.Timah, New york, SoCal.
    Posts
    930

    Default

    oo thanks... the rts III just came today via ups.. i LOVE the feel of the body..

    i also ordered a new 50mm 1.4 from adorama for around 170 usd after bargaining like siao with the chao ang moh salesman... heehhee


    well thanks guys...

    i hope they start a contax forum here soon

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
    Posts
    1,159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F5user
    oo thanks... the rts III just came today via ups.. i LOVE the feel of the body..

    i also ordered a new 50mm 1.4 from adorama for around 170 usd after bargaining like siao with the chao ang moh salesman... heehhee


    well thanks guys...

    i hope they start a contax forum here soon
    I am a Contax fan too! I owned a Contax T3 and I can tell you that Zeiss lenses are

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    B.Timah, New york, SoCal.
    Posts
    930

    Default

    Somehow, whenever i shoot with zeiss lenses... i jsut wonder why canon's charging so much for their lenses...

    Though I use canon for work quite a abit, i don't fancy paying so much for quaility that cannot be matched to zeiss in terms of contrast and sharpness.

    yes, in terms of bells and whistles like autofocusing, IS,and etc etc.. yeah.. canon's good...

    but other than that... sigh....

    oh well...

    just a though here .


  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Under the Son
    Posts
    2,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F5user
    Somehow, whenever i shoot with zeiss lenses... i jsut wonder why canon's charging so much for their lenses...

    Though I use canon for work quite a abit, i don't fancy paying so much for quaility that cannot be matched to zeiss in terms of contrast and sharpness.

    yes, in terms of bells and whistles like autofocusing, IS,and etc etc.. yeah.. canon's good...

    but other than that... sigh....

    oh well...

    just a though here .

    hahaha, yeah agree, im use 3 brand of lens and happy with all, just Use the right lens in the right positions.

    All have a pro and cons, just maximize the pro's one......
    ubans.com

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
    Posts
    1,159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F5user
    Somehow, whenever i shoot with zeiss lenses... i jsut wonder why canon's charging so much for their lenses...

    Though I use canon for work quite a abit, i don't fancy paying so much for quaility that cannot be matched to zeiss in terms of contrast and sharpness.

    yes, in terms of bells and whistles like autofocusing, IS,and etc etc.. yeah.. canon's good...

    but other than that... sigh....

    oh well...

    just a though here .

    For Canon, you are merely paying more for their R&D work on technology.
    For Zeiss and Leica, you are paying for their quality world-class optics!!

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    In the void.
    Posts
    1,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XXX Boy
    For Canon, you are merely paying more for their R&D work on technology.
    For Zeiss and Leica, you are paying for their quality world-class optics!!
    My RTSIII is working fine... Use it mainly to take slides when I travel. The build of the camera is great but the controls are not that intuitive.

    The different brands of cameras are built for different consumer class in mind lah. I don't see how you are going to use a Contax to take quality picture for fast-paced sports etc etc. Not impossible to get great pictures, but just a bit more difficult. Even the most-skilled photographers are going to have trouble lah. Having superior image quality is pointless unless you can get the opportunity to take the pictures first.Technology just make this window of opportunity easier to catch.Can't really compare like that lah.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    B.Timah, New york, SoCal.
    Posts
    930

    Default

    my comparison was mainly based on still shots, mostly with my family....

    for sports and press coverages.. i wouldn't even DREAM of using anything other than canon / nikon...

    but oh well..

    thanks for you input.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •