ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Canon

Canon Exhilaration Of Sight


 
Thread Tools
Old 17th January 2005   #1
trucatus
Advertiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,588
Default 300D underexpose with 550EX

Hi does anyone have the problem of underexpose image with the 330D combine with 550EX? I find the exposure about 2/3 under consistantly....
__________________
www.camwerkz.com
trucatus is offline  
Old 17th January 2005   #2
sonix
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sengkang
Posts: 1,314
Default

Not enough information to answer your question.

It could be due too you focus on white or bright color and many other possibilities.
__________________
My humble gallery
sonix is offline  
Old 17th January 2005   #3
loupgarou
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,794
Default

are you using M mode ( center average weighted) when shooting with flash? (eg: set your camera to 1/200 f/8 , the flash should output at a level to illuminate your subject/scene), not bright enough, then up the FEC
loupgarou is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 17th January 2005   #4
trucatus
Advertiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,588
Default

I tried both the darker and brighter objects the brighter object worst and the darker object 2/3 under still...set my camera to 2/3 over expose and always gives me good exposure....should I send to Canon?
__________________
www.camwerkz.com
trucatus is offline  
Old 17th January 2005   #5
loupgarou
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,794
Default

first, what are you metering off? is your monitor calibrated? shooting in raw or jpg or mode? is your flash set in ettl mode or manual mode?

show us some pictures first. include exif information. and indicate where you meter off in the picture.
loupgarou is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #6
trucatus
Advertiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,588
Default

I still don;t know how to insert picture.....maybe will post it the gallery....
__________________
www.camwerkz.com
trucatus is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #7
theITguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In this small world
Posts: 2,042
Default

I thought 300D all along have a liking to underexpose?
theITguy is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #8
loupgarou
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,794
Default

yes, but the guy say he bump up the fec already, and he gets overexposure, so it seems a problem with where and how he is metering.

my suggestion, shoot in raw and you don't really have to bother too much about exposure.

read

http://daystarvisions.com/Docs/Tuts/Meter/pg5.html

Last edited by loupgarou; 18th January 2005 at 10:19 AM.
loupgarou is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #9
lsl03
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western Singapore
Posts: 370
Default

300D with inbuild or external flash will underexpose the picture, you have to compensate 2/3 to get a proper exposure. It is normal for this cam, take a look at Imaging resource for the review:

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/EDR/EDRPICS.HTM
lsl03 is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #10
theITguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In this small world
Posts: 2,042
Default

Originally Posted by loupgarou
yes, but the guy say he bump up the fec already, and he gets overexposure, so it seems a problem with where and how he is metering.

my suggestion, shoot in raw and you don't really have to bother too much about exposure.

read

http://daystarvisions.com/Docs/Tuts/Meter/pg5.html

Thought he say over expose by 2/3 stop and always give him good exposure??
theITguy is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #11
knoxknocks
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: lalaland
Posts: 3,897
Default

as some of the guys have pointed out, difficult to tell unless you've got a picture and also what you were doing (e-ttl or manual on the flash? M, Av or Tv on the body?)

If the room has generally white walls/mirrors or predominantly reflective, your preflash will tell the body to compensate by underexposing (if you're using E-TTL). If room has generally darker tones of paint etc, your preflash will tell the body to compensate by overexposing. Also, if you're taking portraits, color of the clothes, skin tones etc also affect exposure when preflash reflects these things.

Shutter speed and aperture is really used to expose for the ambient light. Can try to use Manual on the body f5.6 1/60. The flash does the rest of the work for the main subject.

just my 2cents...
knoxknocks is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #12
loupgarou
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Thought he say over expose by 2/3 stop and always give him good exposure??
sorry lah, my singlish not so powerful, thought he said upping exposure compensation by 2/3 gives him over exposure.
loupgarou is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #13
trucatus
Advertiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,588
Default

I meter with a grey card still under la.....confirm underexpose by 2/3.....
Mode is in ETTL in the 550EX and camera using P mode. I thought the technology suppose to be good in 2005?
__________________
www.camwerkz.com
trucatus is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #14
+evenstar
Senior Member
 
+evenstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 5,452
Default

Mine too..even if it was taking a photo of a friend at point blank range (~1m from the face)...whole photo was dark though FEC on the flash was set at +1/3
__________________
the SEARCH FUNCTION is there for a reason. USE IT!
+evenstar is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #15
Prismatic
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In the void.
Posts: 1,215
Default

Try this page and see if your question is answered there.
http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-flash/#faq3
Prismatic is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #16
knoxknocks
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: lalaland
Posts: 3,897
Default

Originally Posted by trucatus
I meter with a grey card still under la.....confirm underexpose by 2/3.....
Mode is in ETTL in the 550EX and camera using P mode. I thought the technology suppose to be good in 2005?
When you meter off the gray card, make sure you use FE Lock. Otherwise, when you recompose, the correct shutter speed/aperture is lost. You can verify this by checking the shutter speed/aperture when you meter off the gray card, and when you recompose to include your subject. See pg 34 of your 550EX manual.

My suggestion is to use Manual mode on the body. Saves the trouble of trying to "outsmart" a dumb camera
knoxknocks is offline  
Old 18th January 2005   #17
loupgarou
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,794
Default

actually....

metering off gray cards =

did you know gray card is 18% gray BUT almost all camera meters are calibrated for 12% ....search the web to corroborate my statement..
loupgarou is offline  
Old 19th January 2005   #18
trucatus
Advertiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,588
Default

I use the same grey card for my EOS 3 for many years. It never give me such problem. So I think the % should be correct. Just maybe there are difference in the metering system or a calibration error.
__________________
www.camwerkz.com
trucatus is offline  
Old 19th January 2005   #19
loupgarou
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,794
Default

http://www.bythom.com/graycards.htm


trucatus, when you meter off gray card in film, do you process the film/get the film lab to process it? I'm sure there are adjustments they do.

300D histogram gives you instant feedback, so you know how it is. and there's nothing wrong with leaving fec +2/3
loupgarou is offline  
Old 19th January 2005   #20
trucatus
Advertiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,588
Default

Forgot to mention the exposure for non flash photography is great. Underexpose only during flash photography.
__________________
www.camwerkz.com
trucatus is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.12303 seconds with 7 queries