Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: What's a good histogram?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    2,156

    Red face What's a good histogram?

    Since u guys using histogram rather than seeing the pic in the LCD...wondering what's a good histogram?

    is it a histogram that is balanced? whereby the chart is evenly distributed?

    Pardon me, I never use histogram before. I just use my eye to see the LCD...

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Outside the Dry Box.
    Posts
    16,268

    Default

    i dun use histogram as well, but from my basic understanding, its more for normal fotos to prevent over or under expose pictures.

    if a histogram shows a skew to either side den the picture have more of that portion (left for dark, right for light?... i dunno...) so if u taking a shot that have scenery den should have quite even distribution...

    for shots like white background in product shoot, the histogram is kinda useless, cos more than 50% of the pic would be white hence a skew... maybe i still not used 2 it...
    Logging Off. "You have 2,631 messages stored, of a total 400 allowed." don't PM me.

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    4,026

    Default A Good Histogram....

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_Yeo
    Since u guys using histogram rather than seeing the pic in the LCD...wondering what's a good histogram?

    is it a histogram that is balanced? whereby the chart is evenly distributed?

    Pardon me, I never use histogram before. I just use my eye to see the LCD...
    Hi Paul....

    Well....here is my take on what a good histogram would be....

    Histogram is basically a guide for the users to have a feel of what the overall
    distribution of the photo - if checked through the smalled LCD.....

    On the Histogram:
    a) Extreme right wall - highlights or white (areas on images categorised in this region are normally unrecoverable....resulting loss of detail....)

    b) Extreme left wall - Black or shadow (areas on image that may be too black/dark or in dark shadows that may not be able to be recovered.....through post process....

    Therefore....in general....a good histogram would be one which has a distribution centralised spread across the left and right....
    If there are many shadows or highlight /white areas, then can't help it.....these would come up as spikes close or on the extreme left or right walls...

    So depends on what you are shooting (scene) couple the captured scene with the histogram would give one a better idea on the overall subject brightness range of the scene.

    Hope it helps...

    rgds,
    sulhan
    Last edited by sulhan; 7th January 2005 at 07:59 PM.

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    West side of S'pore
    Posts
    5,528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sulhan
    Hi Paul....

    Well....here is my take on what a good histogram would be....

    Histogram is basically a guide for the users to have a feel of what the overall
    distribution of the photo - if checked through the smalled LCD.....

    On the Histogram:
    a) Extreme left wall - highlights or white (areas on images categorised in this region are normally unrecoverable....resulting loss of detail....)

    b) Extreme right wall - Black or shadow (areas on image that may be too black/dark or in dark shadows that may not be able to be recovered.....through post process....

    Therefore....in general....a good histogram would be one which has a distribution centralised spread across the left and right....
    If there are many shadows or highlight /white areas, then can't help it.....these would come up as spikes close or on the extreme left or right walls...

    So depends on what you are shooting (scene) couple the captured scene with the histogram would give one a better idea on the overall subject brightness range of the scene.

    Hope it helps...

    rgds,
    sulhan
    Hi Sulhan,

    I think its the other way round, extreme left wall for black/shadow, extreme right wall for highlights/white right?

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    4,026

    Default Hahaha....slip off the typo....

    Thanks Garion.....

    Hahah....i realised it when i got back home....and read it....

    Thanks Bro....

    Corrected it oreadi....

    rgds,
    sulhan

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    2,156

    Default

    OK. today, i will try to play with the histogram.

    Thanks!

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    GEYLAND LOR 15 LO
    Posts
    1,159

    Default

    A good histogram is no histogram!

  9. #9

    Default

    I find below link provide useful information on histogram

    http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...stograms.shtml

    which Drudkh has posted it previously. Have you read it?

    If happen tt your graph appears more at the left side, it show it is underexposed. However underexposed does not mean your shot is not good ... most night shots are more to underexposed ... so what is a good histogram ???
    See my Photo Gallery at the Clubsnap

  10. #10

    Cool

    as indicated in the luminous landscape website, there isnt any such thing as a good or bad histogram...
    its just to indicate to the user that there are certain parts of the pic are either over or under exposed...
    the fz20 comes with a histogram display and i find it useful to check for over blown highlights in the pic...
    quite useful esp out in the field where the sun is bright and u cant really see the details in the preview screen...
    too many shots...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •