![]() |
|
|||||||
| Konica-Minolta legacy The essentials of imaging. Forum for past Konica-Minolta cameras and equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 1,664
|
hmm because of the post on a200 low light focusing, have started thinking about the focus options again.
would like to get a1/a2/a200 users' opinions on which options they use, and when and why. basically, flex-point vs center-area is no contest lah, use flex-point all the time, else camera happy happy focus on wrong thing. but what about: a) single vs continuous b) full-time AF on or off? (what the different combinations do can be found here ) my camera is always set at single+fulltime AF. the continuous mode can't really seem to track anything even remotely fast moving, really no point. i don't know if it's my imagination, but focus speeds seem slightly faster with fulltime AF on (just gut feel). how 'bout the rest of you? is the fulltime AF worth using, or is it just a waste of battery? and are the continuous/tracking modes useful in any kind of situation at all? really hope to find new ways of using the camera better. thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,594
|
On my A2
Single plus Full time AF off ---> 95% Manual Focus -->5% Hart |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 1,664
|
thx for input Agetan...
how bout the other Ax users? any tips on focus options? ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Batok West Avenue 2
Posts: 1,739
|
A1 99.9% Single AF, Flex-focus set to center. Handgrip sensor and full time AF off (conserve battery power, habit from my Dimage 5 heritage)
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 2,088
|
Multi-point "intelligent" sensors have come a long way since about a decade ago. But as "intelligent" as they are, they are still no match for the human brain. How can a camera CPU really know which point *I* want to focus on? My Dynax 60 is said to be an improvement over the Dynax 5, with 9 focus points instead of 7.
Hence, whatever camera I use, it'll always be on spot-focusing (or flex-focus tied with AE-spot on the A2.) I never use focus-tracking (C-AF) either, for the simple fact that they never seem to work as well as advertised. The A2's focus tracking seems to lose its bite on the subject if it moves even at a moderate speed. People say the A2 is not good enough for sports photography because of this. I say, use manual-focus ("trap-focus") and it'll be good enough for any sport during daytime.
__________________
The synapseman uses Sony Alpha system & Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 1,664
|
hmm... so it seems that really no one has found a use for the 'C' mode on the S/C/M switch...
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 97
|
.On the other hand, it is quite useless with subject that moves fairly quickly like kids or animals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 97
|
Just heard from someone that you can enhance focusing performance when setting anti-shake to "on" full time (as opposed to only active after shuttle is press).
Sound logical to me since the camara uses the image for focusing. Does anyone has any experience with this? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|