![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 599
|
Hi all,
Would like to start a name list thread on AF-S VR 24-120mm. Owner of this lens please state your pros and cons. Also for those who own this lens b4, please state the reason why sold off this lens. thanks... hope this thread helps those bros who are going to buy this lens. Current Owners name list: 1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2. 3. Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. 2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. 2. 3. 4. thanks alot.... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tanjong Pagar
Posts: 301
|
Current Owners name list:
1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2.HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. 3. No complaints Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. 2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. 2. 3. 4. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Just for the fun of it
![]() Current Owners name list: 1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2.HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. No complaints Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. espn - no $$ to support hobby used it extensively for events, casual shooting, street etc.2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. 2. 3. 4. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tanjong Pagar
Posts: 301
|
Can handle most situations well...
Sports: ![]() Portraits: ![]() Night: ![]() Landscape: ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,864
|
Current Owners name list:
1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2. HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. No complaints 3. Dennis Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. Cons - soft at WA, slow, not wide enough for DSLR Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. espn - no $$ to support hobby used it extensively for events, casual shooting, street etc.2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. 2. 3. 4. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ho Chi Minh City
Posts: 1,238
|
__________________
[/spending][/BBB][/FUN] |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ho Chi Minh City
Posts: 1,238
|
Any1 tried this lense with a TC?? Or is it compatible at all with TC??
TC-14= 34-168mm <--- very good range TC-17= 41-204mm <--- solid for portrait TC 20= 48-240mm <--- portrait and sports
__________________
[/spending][/BBB][/FUN] |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: singapore
Posts: 2,023
|
drool............................................. sam when can you shoot like that??? i think i have to get my 70-200 soon......the itch is getting stronger everyday... can't sleep, can't eat...call you guys up but all you guys tell me is to BUY BUY BUY........HELP!!!!!! Please dun tell me to BUY BUY BUY.....
__________________
www.weddingdairy.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
![]() The ranges are pretty good if it's possible, but you forgot 1.4X + f/3.5-5.6 -> f/4.5-8 1.7X + f/3.5-5.6 -> f/5-10 2X + f/3.5-5.6 -> f/6.3-11 How to focus at f/8-11? ![]() Last edited by espn; 23rd December 2004 at 10:20 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ho Chi Minh City
Posts: 1,238
|
The poison originates from within, we simply make you realised that you have poison in your blood stream only. ![]()
__________________
[/spending][/BBB][/FUN] |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 303
|
Current Owners name list:
1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2. HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. No complaints 3. Dennis Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. Cons - soft at WA, slow, not wide enough for DSLR 4. Sk8te Pro - Good build, good price, VR power roxx, useful range Cons - Too slow... if only this is constant 2.8 or something.... Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. espn - no $$ to support hobby used it extensively for events, casual shooting, street etc.2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. 2. 3. 4. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,500
|
I used it with the kenko 1.4x last time to shoot butterflies. Stepped down to f11, its pretty decent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 303
|
I have posted this pics in another thread but seems like not much comments there... so here goes again...Both pics taken hand held without flash at night at my void deck. Exposure 1/2.5sec 78mm at F7.1. Both taken with my D70 and only resized by capture.
Pic taken without VR Pic taken with VR switched on Last edited by Sk8te; 23rd December 2004 at 10:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 284
|
Current Owners name list:
1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2. HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. No complaints 3. Dennis Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. Cons - soft at WA, slow, not wide enough for DSLR 4. Staz Pro - Good Range, fast focusing. love the vr as well. Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. espn - no $$ to support hobby used it extensively for events, casual shooting, street etc. 2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. 2. 3. 4. Last edited by staz; 13th February 2005 at 06:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TheDaysMovie.com
Posts: 1,902
|
Current Owners name list:
1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2. HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. No complaints 3. Dennis Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. Cons - soft at WA, slow, not wide enough for DSLR 4. Staz Pro - Good Range, fast focusing. love the vr as well. soft image at 5.6 makes it good for taking portraits too. 5. Kerpalz Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. the cheapest VR u can find!!! Cons - cannot find... unless comparing the AFS VS USM hahaha Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. espn - no $$ to support hobby used it extensively for events, casual shooting, street etc. 2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. 2. 3. 4. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the heart of SengKang
Posts: 5,024
|
Current Owners name list:
1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2. HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. No complaints 3. Dennis Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. Cons - soft at WA, slow, not wide enough for DSLR 4. Staz Pro - Good Range, fast focusing. love the vr as well. soft image at 5.6 makes it good for taking portraits too. 5. Kerpalz Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. the cheapest VR u can find!!! Cons - cannot find... unless comparing the AFS VS USM hahaha Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. espn - no $$ to support hobby used it extensively for events, casual shooting, street etc. 2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. King Tiger (can consider lah if someone wanna to sell me at $600~$800 )2. 3. 4.
__________________
War is one of the most regrettable human activities. |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 303
|
oi tiger stick to your 17-55 DX lar... hahah I also damn gian that lens... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Nikon
Posts: 22,045
|
Ska8te!!! No no.. 28-70
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 675
|
Current Owners name list:
1. Sam_always pros - VR, good range, solid built and AF-S cons - not yet found 2. HotSpots Pro - Good walk-about range, great image quality (except when wide open), well-balanced, VR works like a charm. No complaints 3. Dennis Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. Cons - soft at WA, slow, not wide enough for DSLR 4. Staz Pro - Good Range, fast focusing. love the vr as well. soft image at 5.6 makes it good for taking portraits too. 5. Kerpalz Pro - Good range with VR, SWM, good build. the cheapest VR u can find!!! Cons - cannot find... unless comparing the AFS VS USM hahaha 6. rtbh Pro - good range for walkabout, swm and vr. yup! cheapest nikon lens with vr and swm. Cons - would be better with f2.8 thru out and yet still maintain at this price. Ex Owner name list: (name and reason why sold off this lens) 1. espn - no $$ to support hobby used it extensively for events, casual shooting, street etc. 2. 3. 4. Future Owner name list: 1. King Tiger (can consider lah if someone wanna to sell me at $600~$800 ) 2. 3. 4.
__________________
My Photos...http://www.pbase.com/wintersonata |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 303
|
NO..... not the 28-70!!!! POISON!! hahah
someone here dun like me lar... took me out of the list of owners... I also said the lack of fast speed... if 2.8 through out then this lens would be PERFECT!!! |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|