Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: SLIK Pro 500 and 400 DX

  1. #1
    Deregistered satan_18349's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    hell 極樂世&
    Posts
    1,498

    Default SLIK Pro 500 and 400 DX

    Hihi, need some comments on these two tripods which i think i may be getting... main diff is the height, anything else? Got some very different quotations from CP and AP... Thank youuuu...

  2. #2
    Senior Member erictan8888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,885

    Default

    i have the 400DX.... very robust and steady....
    dun know about the 500 though...
    Hope to learn from everyone here....

  3. #3
    Deregistered satan_18349's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    hell 極樂世&
    Posts
    1,498

    Default

    Anymore comments on these two tripods??

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by satan_18349
    Hihi, need some comments on these two tripods which i think i may be getting... main diff is the height, anything else? Got some very different quotations from CP and AP... Thank youuuu...
    1. Check if both tripod max load meet your need (your equipment). Go for the one that meet your need (duh!)
    2. Is the weight of tripod concern you? Just imagine yourself carrying this tripod +ballhead+all your equipment all day long. If yes, go for the one that is lighter
    3. Is the length of the tripod folded concern you? If yes, go for the one that is shorter. If not, go for the one that is closer to your eye level (fully expanded) without having to extend its center column.

    I feel that number 1 is the most important, number 2 and 3 is a trade off (you can't get both) -- carbon fiber anyone ?

  5. #5

    Default

    Slik Pro 500 DX is heavy. I definitely carry it around with a strap. You might not feel it when going for short distances, but if walking for a full day or going for tours, every kilogram counts and compactness is also an important factor.

    It all depends what you want. It's a trade off. Better, Lighter, Cheaper--pick any two

  6. #6

    Default

    Actually, 500dx and 400dx are about the same weight ...... hehehehe.... but then for travelling, I will use 400dx, but for stationary item I will use 500dx as 400dx is less bulky, 500dx is longer and the legs are thicker

  7. #7
    Deregistered satan_18349's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    hell 極樂世&
    Posts
    1,498

    Default

    mmm...funny thing is... the e-quote for the 500DX that i got from cathay was actually cheaper than the 400DX.. I did went down personally and indeed 500DX was priced lower than the 400DX...

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by satan_18349
    mmm...funny thing is... the e-quote for the 500DX that i got from cathay was actually cheaper than the 400DX.. I did went down personally and indeed 500DX was priced lower than the 400DX...
    What's the problem there? As I mentioned 500DX is bulkier but able to carry heavier weight, even though the weight of 500DX is similer to 400Dx. 400DX is more vesatile. When I go overseas for tour, I will bring along the 400DX and not the 500DX. But when I am talking still life pictures or macro, I would rely on 500DX more as it is more stable.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •