No.Originally Posted by Rashkae
I said TRY D7000 also.
TRYING is not a suggestion to BUY.
ALSO - implies in addition to what is being discussed.
TRYING is a good thing, widens your horizons.
Last edited by lotus80; 3rd June 2012 at 09:29 PM.
I would recommend Mirrorless since there are models that are small size yet they can also do what you listed with added benefit of more easier to smuggle them into places where DSLR are not allowed and being mirrorless, barely any sound when taking pics.
Definitely the pics should be nicer then the usual run of the mill pns and handphone camera since you will have selection of lens to choose from.
Last edited by Reportage; 3rd June 2012 at 10:58 PM.
You wont see me much less remember me but i am the guy who makes you look good.
That wasn't relevant either. Let the person decide, everyone else can make suggestions.Originally Posted by Rashkae
If need to go micro four third, why not consider EP3? Been using EP1 with 17mm f2.8 for 35mm worth of goodness. The internal stabilizer is good enough i wonder why they make new stabilizer system for EM5.
DSLR dont make you look pro either, everyone can afford it, people wears it everywhere especially during weekends like blings. I rather look low profile. If i can handle this with small camera, why bring heavy sets of equipments? But all depends on situation or what you will be shooting. Cheers
Ahh... I see... Viewfinder is always a great plus. Been using external optical viewfinder on EP1, not very accurate, cant see where im focusing too... Second hand EP2 maybe? Price difference can get you a few sets of external viewfinder
There are pros and cons to dslr and mirrorless. If weight is the main consideration mirrorless is the way to go. I prefer dslrs for the ergonomics and ovf.Originally Posted by Prajna
i got the NEX-7 as my fun camera. basically just for chit-chat and dinner sessions etc with friends.
also for a back-up cam
Good one on this article n seriously i hv wanted to follow n sell all my gear but not at the moments. OMD is a tramp for I use them to shoot at Gaga concert with pana tele zoom still greatOriginally Posted by rhino123
+1 to DSLR Camera because of ovf. I feel ovf is essential for a beginner to play with photography. Just my 2 cents worth
Look at it this way, for example I might use a iphone, shoot fabulous shots that met with the standards and expectation of the shoot, while some other guy who uses a D4 or D800E or medium format camera (hassabalt) shoot with amatuer standard or no standards at all, and they got the job?
Nonsense. You don't need an ovf to learn composition. An ovf will not improve your images.Originally Posted by lewissac
Take your 2 cents and invest them in knowledge.